Are you suggesting that boys growing into men being repeatedly shown women as object to be abused and degraded for their pleasure doesn’t teach them that women are objects to be abused and degraded for their pleasure? They are TAUGHT that fantasy. From a very early age. To think it has no effect on their attitude is…

There was some pretty extreme porn even before the 20th century, but the difference was that it wasn’t as wide-spread and considered normal. Now what you’re describing is basically mainstream, it’s horrific.

A lot of these women are not “simulating” getting raped repeatedly. They are literally being raped on camera. Are you going to pretend that you have no idea about the amount of non-consensual activity that goes on on porn sets? A lot of the women are drugged and/or coerced by money into performing acts they do not…

Jesus, that is awful. And unfortunately situations like this occur far too often.

Are you saying that there is a connection between porn and having rape “fantasies”? Surely porn sounds like grooming in that case.

You really don’t know the difference between being repeatedly raped on screen and spending a day in the water once?

What a bizarre comparison. There is no worldwide epidemic of women being forced to stay in tanks of water for whole days (has that even ever happened on any movie set, ever?). Sexual violence against women on the other hand, is very prevalent in our society and has been for millennia. Today, this violence is filmed…

It most likely was. And you’re still derailing, stubbornly trying to avoid the very real effect that MODERN violent pervasive mainstream pornography has on male behaviour. It’s not working.

Of course. However, in this particular intersection, female subjugation is a problem, from the optics of this awareness program.

If both partners consent freely, sure. Not in porn, though, because consent is difficult if not impossible to determine.

Oh, pfftt, I am only here to criticise choice “feminists” such as yourself as I have deep disgust for this site and its fans.

In private? Maybe. MAYBE. In public, where it’s become the utterly prevalent presentation of female “sexuality” for sale? ABSOLUTELY NOT. Period.

Yes, because your feels supercede facts.

There’s nothing a domestic abuse survivor wants to wear more than a wifebeater tank top with a mostly naked photo of a porn star on it!

When I was choked during sex to the point of not being able to breathe, and I ended up with bruises on my neck. Afterwards, I asked him, “what in god’s name made you think that was okay?”
His answer: “The girls in porn seem to like it.”

No. It’s a scientific issue.

In general, I don’t think it necessarily does either. But there are areas of porn that are explicitly about power, violence, and female subjugation, because there are people who like it.

Objection to porn is a moralistic issue. Objection to violence against women is a human rights issue.

I would run from a guy wearing one of those shirts.

“these unique designs” = pin-up style photos of Mack on otherwise unremarkable tees and tanks.