I'm not so sure that they are friends. That Citroen looks pretty angry that it has to sit behind the VW.
I'm not so sure that they are friends. That Citroen looks pretty angry that it has to sit behind the VW.
The Mercury looks more like the AMC than the Ford though.....
Sorry, the Miata starts at $23,970, while the Jeep starts at $22,595. Jeep is lower cost.
I'm too big to fit into a Smart or the Fiat 500. That means I do not consider them to be actual cars. Most golf carts can carry more people and luggage than a Smart.
Well, that's what I would do. But for those who have to have a brand new car with a warranty....
At $22,000, It is the lowest cost convertible on the market. A full $7,000 less than base v-6 mustang/camaro. You can't argue with the price.
Well, the differences are difficult to spot, the 500k is just an update of the SSK, but mostly because the majority of them were coach built cars so no two are alike anyway.
I thought it was a SSK too (the sharpe V grille), but the shop that is selling it has it labeled as a 500K.
Sorry, I really want to combine the two, but I don't have any computer program that can do that. Can anyone help me?
So, the CT6 might just be a long wheelbase hybrid CTS?
Even for people who don't get the reference, it sounds good for a Jeep. It has a tough and sturdy sound to it.
The debate that going on in this thread explains my problem with Hyundai/Kia exactly. Neither have a clear vision. They both are going after the cheap market, and upscale. One brand cannot do both successfully. One needs to go up, and one stay cheap, so they aren't fighting each other the entire way.