This happens more often than you think. It’s not reflective of the quality of work a lawyer does. Sometimes, there’s just so much information that people tend to take the same logical steps to follow through.

Ho, Shoe! I finally found you :)

My Law and Order degree says yes.

That sounds about right.

I stand by what I said- you can reread it anytime you want.

Well, in regards to consent and sex, many of us weren’t taught anything in the fucking 90's. I learned most of what I knew from my older sisters, who were...well, they were kids.

Stop talking out of both sides of your mouth instead of blaming me.

A blowjob the day before is not consent for the next day.

I am of the same generation. You are blaming crappy tv for behaviour that should have been instinctual.

All I’m hearing are excuses to why you think it’s ok not to get true consent. Your 90's argument doesn’t fly because I am of the same generation. The 90s was in the middle of the safe sex era and every conversation about condoms included a lesson in what consent is.

I’ll do what I please but to follow your logic, I said goodbye to your favorite charity.

Are you sure that’s what you were taught or what you think you were taught.

I didn’t know there was a rape scene. That just makes it that much harder to defend it.

Dear Broken Record,

All that sorrow won’t bring back the dead.

I was thinking- maybe the loophole to this is if Parker signs off all of this movie’s future proceeds to a bunch of rape crisis centers, rape kit testing charities and suicide prevention.

Worse still is that he doesn’t need to hear yes but has to notice an implicit no.

We’ve seperated art and the creator before. I’ll see the movie but will wait until it hits the discount bins.

“I never thought about consent as a definition, especially as I do now,” Parker told Ebony. “I think the definitions of so many things have changed.”