Nope.

The odd thing about that graph is that it’s lowest point isn’t at zero,but a tad faster. Suggesting that the public is safest if everyone starts driving 3mph over the average speed.

Also the rise of the cell phone

I won’t doubt that physics and the less room for error + everyday distractions lead to more deaths than needed, even as cars have become safer. You can’t beat physics.

You'd be wrong. Which is fine, I guess.

I’m just impressed someone had the sense to film this in landscape mode.

Viper ACR-X from the third generation. Race car edition Viper without any nannies except for ABS. Whoever got this around the Nurburgring in 7:03 is superhuman.

Change gear, change gear, change gear, check mirror... murder a prostitute. Change gear, change gear, murder.

He has waaaayyyyy more money than her...

Yes, but.

Hah. The Porsche would be better for both!

Let me know when that happens.

Because you cant just turn the corner and fill up your EV in 2 minutes. That’s why.

I don’t think that really speaks to his question. I think he wants some real world testing. Like, let’s have Car&Driver roam around L.A. traffic for a few hours with the A/C on and see what kind of range is realistic. Or the other scenarios he mentioned.

Maybe it’s a wagon

As I mentioned in this article, had you bothered to read all of it, was that the AT is the first Adventure Bike that’s hidden enough of its weight well enough to sort of be what I’m saying these bikes should be.

Jeep really sets the bar high for any other manufacturer to try to win the “Let’s show people all the cool stuff we could build but won’t” award. I feel like every year they bring functioning concept cars that are close enough to their production vehicles that it seems like they could make it pretty easily and then…

The prevailing lore is the term refers to the result of what a person looks like after a crash wearing a helmet but no other protective gear: