She either chose to do good things because she is a good person like The Doctor, or she chose to do them in order to get something for herself because she is not a good person. It's one of those two things. Either way, she isn't owed anything. Neither is anyone else who The Doctor allows to travel with him through…

I'm sorry, didn't "The Five-ish Doctors Reboot" get packaged with the 50th as well? Is that canon? I don't think getting included on a DVD set should really be a barometer. Of course, I've got no problem with it overall. I still don't really count Hurt as anything but a Richard Hurdnall stand-in for Chris. But McGann…

Good point. I was thinking "aired on Doctor Who", as in the actual show itself.

"There is a new book on the creation of Wonder Woman that just game out. Martson is on record as saying "I created this character to be an empowering figure for girls" way more of how that character operates is fundamentally gendered."

"Yes, we know you hate Clara. You didn't have to use those words to express it. Your entire interpretation of her in this episode is based on your deeply biased reaction to her, which twists everything to match your pre-held hatred of the character. Your every word drips with hatred for Clara and everyone who likes…

Well, no understand, just because I hated McCoy's era doesn't mean I hated McCoy, or didn't still watch. Just as then, I love Capaldi and I'll still watch the show…if for no other reason than I always have, thick or thin. But just like back then, I'll still have an opinion on it. ;) lol And let's not forget, at least…

"you can be assured that The Doctor will maintain the white, male privilege that you so deeply insist upon."

"Wonder Woman is a false equivalency (the character is specifically designed to be a feminist character)"

"It's not like she's an intergalactic space pirate one minute and an 18th Century clown-themed vigilante the next."

Well, if we're going on "creators intent", then that means the Morbius Doctors are back in play, and the Cartmel Masterplan still intact. However, for now, it's a whole gray area I don't think harms anything really. Got nothing against BF, for sure. Good call about Human Nature, btw.

The Doctor has never kidnapped and held her family hostage, killing them one by one in an effort to force his will upon her. So, he's never made that kind of mistake.

"Same as the majority of TV, then. She can be both, because she's written by so many different people"

Speaking of "crooked readings"…..I don't see how you are making actual comparisons there. You seem to be approaching it with your mind already made up, as nothing you are offering translates the same with what she intentionally acted out. Am I supposed to believe that her crying when she threw all the keys in the…

Ah! Thanks. Thought it might be from BF.

"I am making sense. Men are NOT gender prime. There are two equal genders. Neither one is special. Neither one is the "alternative"

Who is Alex MacQueen? I don't remember him. Is this an alt-media Master like from a spinoff or the Big Finish audio apocrypha? And are we really going to "count" Gordon Tipple? Wasn't he just supposed to be the Ainley Master? I mean, at least Beevers got lines to say when he was doing Pratt's incarnation.

"The part where you make it sound like that was her entire goal. I know, we've established her actual goal was selfish, and using the TARDIS as part of that plan was reckless. But I do think it was pretty clear she didn't want things to go that far, even if she was willing to take them there."

"Are you kidding? The whole Time Lord Victorious was the Doctor learning exactly what Clara is learning now.

Whovian, is it your paid job to travel from comment to comment in an effort to correct or nitpick people based on your own ideas and opinions? Because you do it well. ;)

See and that's the whole problem here.