I know everyone’s got their own list in their head, but:

I almost understand putting X-2 over 9. X-2 was a really good game that got mostly overlooked.

Running popular forums costs real money, and it takes real time to maintain and moderate. It’s easy to gloss it over as “people are so greedy”, but thousands of bucks a year in hosting costs have to come from somewhere. 

I had legitimately forgotten Sea of Thieves was even a thing.

I agree. Great presentation spread, but, geez, the release dates are fuzzy on a lot of this.

That logic works if you think this can be prevented 100% by the party organizer. I don’t, and I think the logical outcome of that policy would be 1) non-adherence and/or 2) companies stop throwing parties. The fun thing about (2) would mean that the parties would shift to even less controlled settings, where more of…

I’m gonna ask this seriously: do you really want the PAX crew trying to control every vaguely PAX-related event in town? Is that even a rational expectation? Should they be the ones trying to arbitrate what goes on at random parties/gatherings and then dole out consequences based on whatever they’re told?

Yeah, I read this article and was basically “is this really worse than any other big convention?” I’m not excusing the behavior, it’s abhorrent and unacceptable, but it’s just not clear to me that gaming has a problem in particular (or that this article proves it does). I’ve been to some other industry trade shows and…

Yeah, this sounds insanely unlikely to say the least.

Sounds like my experience on XSX. There’s no doubt in my mind that the enemy AI is horrible[1]  and there are some serious technical problems otherwise... but the CORE of the game has some promise and is probably fixable.

There are protective details that aren’t secret service, and don’t necessarily get cool guy armored cars. Cops also are generally in vehicles without bulletproof glass, and thus also benefit from this sort of training.

Hey, I lean libertarian. I’m with you. The war on model training is going to work about as well as the war on software piracy, which is to say, not very, and with even less justification. The idea that every new piece of art will now need to be vetted for AI usage sounds absolutely insane on the face of it.

There’s a lot of creative types out there who are panicked they’re going to be out of a job, and are basically fumbling for any reason to outlaw this technology (be it for art or the written word) or regulate it to uselessness. They don’t want to come out and say that directly, because it’s 100% counter to every other…

That isn’t really what the article says, but whatever makes you feel good.

Isn’t this proof that the ChatGPT’s internal model is horribly biased, and even the “normal” answers are probably coming from said bias?

This system was pioneered by Jack Welch at GE back in the 80's. Jack died a couple years back, so you will probably not be able to meet him.

That is exactly what’s happening here, yes. The arguments being made against it are forced at best.

The tax situation is not only not that much different, but there are times when the tax code actively punishes married people (the “marriage tax”).

I’m going to Las Vegas next week, I am gonna try to stop there if I find time!

This isn’t a bad theory as they go. As nVidia well knows, it’s a lot easier to lower your prices than raise them, so why not start high and then lower them as old inventory clears and new inventory builds?