It say's Starchy 1, and she is wearing the same shirt that she wore in the "Jake the Brick" episode, and I don't think this is the same Starchy from that episode.

The artists call this creature the "Ice Thing" in the story boards, and they put a lot of emphasis on the missing eye. In fact, a lot of details can be seen in the storyboard, and I enjoy looking at the ones that are noted as important/relevant.

If they dont say he is black, then he is green.

GREEN LIZARD! HE IS NOT A BLACK GUY!

You realize that by generalizing Gus as a racial stereotype, you are, in fact, being racist? Gus is a green man-lizard… if you are associating him with any actual race, then that's on you.

Ship sinking due to "canon".

LOL… After Uncle Grandpa makes his comment about the episode not being canon, he fires the "cannon" into Lars' "ship" with Sadie on it… Lars says, "My ship is sinking!"

"You're a dark hole!"
Best line of the episode.

What makes you say they are looking for writers? Is there a link?

Okay. A thesis (by the way, that wasn't a thesis) in a critique. See, critical writing is not supposed to have a thesis because it is unbiased writing. You use a thesis when you are trying to portray an idea. You really are just showing ignorance on this one, guy. Also, we all know that someone doing something for a…

Yeah. I felt a small part of the universe explode from the sheer magnitude of that one. lol. Still getting the under appreciative down votes, buuuut… worth it. I do imagine the downvoters going "I'll teach you not to be sarcastic on the internet!" as they vote.

Ok. So you see how the article begins with the author's personal opinion about the Marvel universe? That is a bias. An article written with a bias loses credibility and structure. The author then writes about various details contained withing the episode, such as Skye getting shot in the gut and the relationships…

I wasn't trying to "get him good." I posted a criticism. Then I supported my criticism with a follow up. The reviews aren't done well, and I ELABORATE by pointing out that the writer jumps all over the place and lacks structure. Your point is pointless.

Officer: Were you selling those gang members illegal weapons?
Suspect: No!
Officer: What WERE you selling them?
Suspect: …
Officer: Well?
Suspect: I was selling them… YOUR MOM!

Careful. Big Brother is watching ^_^

You don't write reviews very well. You jump all over the place and lack structure.

This review is obviously biased and doesn't even touch on the movie's merits.

Let's not forget the Radioactive Monsters presumed to be marching on the Candy Kingdom

That sounds like a challenge…

That sounds like a challenge…