This is a silly criterion. A sport’s seasonality should be based on what season it’s played, like in high school. Not weather the playing surface is below freezing.

Oh sure but when Arsene Wenger fucks up and lets Messi run around the pitch unchecked, he ends up with unlimited job security.

Actually, he used to play baseball for the Red Sox and the D-Backs.

Since when does skating on ice, indoors, require a wintery outdoor climate?

There's a debate about whether Joey Votto is good?

It's primarily decent people who are opposed.

I only regret that you have but one internet to win for your post.

You do realize you’re thinking like an accountant, right?

“six figure purchasing decision”
“savings”
“purchase price”
“perceived reliability”

Forgoing small savings because you are more concerned about larger savings.

Oh sure, but when I blame the camera, I'm "in denial" and "Pudgy McPudgeface" and "WTF are you chugging cups of mayo again?"

It's actually the Foo Fighters.

Nah, I assume they are telling the truth because IDK and IDGAF about watching the games enough to find out if this is a true statement or not.

No it won’t.

50,000+1,000 > 50,000 + 0,000. In accounting terms and in real world terms.

I don't think you understand how tax write-offs work.

Chess requires hours of practice and training. Playing chess at an elite level is every bit as impressive as being an elite archer. But it's not an Olympic sport.

Advanced stats are good for accurately incorporating fielding ability, according to Advanced Stats.

Well, actually, not *all* takes...

This is already the 50th joke I’ve read that’s funnier than my mediocre attempt. Take this star FFS.

It's a crime that you'll have to pay a gift tax on the Internet you just won.

Ever Tre’d, ever failed, no matter
Tre again, fail again, fail harder.

Unrelated, and idiotically preemptive, but how crazy would it be if Theo Epstein ended up with Boston Red Sox AND Chicago Cubs rings? Would that be the greatest drought-busting run in sports history?