I don’t know, during the W administration it was non-stop boo hoos. Mainly because he and the Republican Congress kept enacting stupid ideas that wrecked the economy and killed a bunch of people, all while taking no responsibility. So, just maybe, people with a memory longer than a gnat are looking at all the stupid…

NO BLUE-BALLERS I KNOW WHAT I HAVE

“Hey, you’re getting politics in my cars!”

Exactly, and ignoring the “children in the road” scenario, if someone were to jump out in front of my car for insurance or suicide or whatever, the car better well damn try to preserve my life at all costs.

It’s the correct answer because your car isn’t omnicient. Will running into that bridge abutment instead of that daisy-chain of kindergardeners bring down the structurally deficient freeway overpass, killing the children and bunch of other people too? Will steering off the side of the bridge to avoid a bunch of…

It sounds heartless, but the only correct answer is the one that Mercedes gave. Would any of us give up control to a car that doesn’t prioritize the survivability of its occupants over anything else? I sure as hell wouldn’t. The car isn’t making a choice to kill those orphans, it’s making a choice not to kill you.…

This is the correct answer to the problem. My property does not get to determine whether I live or die, not for orphans, not for priests, not for the president.

The following statements can simultaneously be true:

My grandfather was shot 3 times in World War II; the leg, the hand and the back. He fought in the Bulge and helped liberate Mauthausen all after recovering. You’ll have to accept my apology for not feeling bad that someone else may have been displaced when he finally returned home to his glorious job as a ticket taker…

One of the last things Ginsburg will ever be is “stupid”. What a joke you are for even suggesting it.

It’s not being stupid, this woman has a career of standing up for women and political minorities as an attorney for the ACLU(she could have made bank for any private firm) at the Court of Appeals and on SCOTUS. It’s disconcerting that social media warriors, most of whom have contributed jack and **** to this issue,…

She’s not wrong on this point. It is similar to flag burning: a legitimate, legal act of protest that some people may take objection to (like most acts of protest).

100% this. Just sit back, enjoy the game and Blizzard will announce the hero whenever they decide to announce the hero.

They’re only doing this to themselves. The *real* winning move in this ARG is to not play

Do you think it’s possible his lawsuit has merit? Can one believe that sexual assault is under-reported, and we live in a society that doesn’t do nearly enough to stop it while also believing it’s possible that a guy could be innocent of what he is accused, and therefore have a legitimate beef with the university?

I remember him getting in trouble in January because people assumed he was dismissing the plight of trams individuals. Naturally you had to wait until after the paywall to see that it was rhetorical, since his finished with this:

I’m starting to see him as the Spencer Tracy character in Guess Who’s Coming To Dinner: stuck in the past but fundamentally good-hearted and open-minded. His newspaper column about transgender issues was IMO the epitome of that: laying down the old views he’d previously had for 90% of the content, but concluding by…

Maybe some of us have had to watch our loved ones decline while in pain every day.