outlanderengine
Outlander Engine
outlanderengine

From the Order

Of course I an attacking you personally. People like you are dangerous. You are scaring normal folks like me. Every single Intelligence agency agrees with the obvious fact that the Russians meddle with our elections. Your opinion, based, I can only guess, on a desire for it not to be true, isn’t as believable as that.

It is impossible for Obama to “go out with dignity”, because the guy replacing him is a complete buffoon. It would be like the changing of the guard at the Tomb of the Unknown soldier where the relief is a fat man in a pink unitard on a unicycle singing Spice Girl lyrics at the top of his lungs.

I don’t know, during the W administration it was non-stop boo hoos. Mainly because he and the Republican Congress kept enacting stupid ideas that wrecked the economy and killed a bunch of people, all while taking no responsibility. So, just maybe, people with a memory longer than a gnat are looking at all the stupid

NO BLUE-BALLERS I KNOW WHAT I HAVE

I’m not gonna fucking help him cover his hospital bills. If someone was standing on the ground and got that tree on his head, THAT guy I would want to help.

“Hey, you’re getting politics in my cars!”

Exactly, and ignoring the “children in the road” scenario, if someone were to jump out in front of my car for insurance or suicide or whatever, the car better well damn try to preserve my life at all costs.

It’s the correct answer because your car isn’t omnicient. Will running into that bridge abutment instead of that daisy-chain of kindergardeners bring down the structurally deficient freeway overpass, killing the children and bunch of other people too? Will steering off the side of the bridge to avoid a bunch of

It sounds heartless, but the only correct answer is the one that Mercedes gave. Would any of us give up control to a car that doesn’t prioritize the survivability of its occupants over anything else? I sure as hell wouldn’t. The car isn’t making a choice to kill those orphans, it’s making a choice not to kill you.

This is the correct answer to the problem. My property does not get to determine whether I live or die, not for orphans, not for priests, not for the president.

The following statements can simultaneously be true:

My grandfather was shot 3 times in World War II; the leg, the hand and the back. He fought in the Bulge and helped liberate Mauthausen all after recovering. You’ll have to accept my apology for not feeling bad that someone else may have been displaced when he finally returned home to his glorious job as a ticket taker

One of the last things Ginsburg will ever be is “stupid”. What a joke you are for even suggesting it.

It’s not being stupid, this woman has a career of standing up for women and political minorities as an attorney for the ACLU(she could have made bank for any private firm) at the Court of Appeals and on SCOTUS. It’s disconcerting that social media warriors, most of whom have contributed jack and **** to this issue,

She’s not wrong on this point. It is similar to flag burning: a legitimate, legal act of protest that some people may take objection to (like most acts of protest).

100% this. Just sit back, enjoy the game and Blizzard will announce the hero whenever they decide to announce the hero.

They’re only doing this to themselves. The *real* winning move in this ARG is to not play

What we need is a scientific consensus... there’s only 99% of scientist agreeing on this, so doubts remain...

Do you think it’s possible his lawsuit has merit? Can one believe that sexual assault is under-reported, and we live in a society that doesn’t do nearly enough to stop it while also believing it’s possible that a guy could be innocent of what he is accused, and therefore have a legitimate beef with the university?

I remember him getting in trouble in January because people assumed he was dismissing the plight of trams individuals. Naturally you had to wait until after the paywall to see that it was rhetorical, since his finished with this: