ouengineer
ouengineer
ouengineer

This is the whole point of the sports sedan segment. Just avoid lowering springs and the models that are significantly lowered and you should have clearance for anything you’ll run across. CUV’s are excessive, more expensive, and dynamically worse.

I bought my BMW 3 series sedan for my “active lifestyle”. Its been offroad to any trail head or campground I’ve wanted to get to. The main difference between it and my Honda Element is that I could sleep inside the Element with my bikes next to me (very useful for living out of for a few years) while the 3 series I

The term “Millenials” is actually two completely separate generations with a crossover around 1987-88 birth date. The people who study these things are just now starting to catch on to this though (which has been obvious to anyone born right before this crossover; those just a few years younger are completely

It seems to me that you owe Brandon, like, a bazillion beers after this.

People seem to think these cars are expensive to maintain. They aren’t. If you are a masochist and do the work yourself. My first two cars were green 3/S’s and I still love them to this day. NP!

Who cares? Hackers can get your card info anywhere. In fact, your card info is likely already on some easily accessed database just waiting for someone to decide they want to use it. That’s what fraud protection is for (and why it’s irresponsible to own a debit card).

After reading through the comments, it appears that the 235/240 is the only real option outside of another 911. Just don’t get the 4 cylinder version (228/230) without ensuring the timing chain guide issue has been addressed.

That VR4 convertible is still an amazingly gorgeous car!

Taller, shorter, and more screens... pretty much the opposite of what an enthusiast wants... it’s going to sell like crazy!

The Lordstown plant feels like a way to test the waters with an electric truck with much less risk (particularly with skirting the union by having a completely different company build it). If demand looks good, then they can jump in with their version.

15 years ago might have been a different story. Now, Toyota’s have too high of resale to generally be good used buys (and since a Toyota owner is more likely to think the car is so reliable it doesn’t need ANY maintenance, I’d be ultra thorough when looking at one). New is a different story since usually you can get

I didn’t think the 22's looked too big either. I just thought that they didn’t look much different/better/noticeable than the 19's on our Ford Edge or 20's/21's on any other car. With a casual glance, it just looks like a normal car on normal size wheels/tires. Yet, the cost difference is around 1k/month more in TCO

This car in green is pretty much my dream car, but I’m guessing I’ll probably end up in a blue S5 sportback or Model 3 due to TCO.

The Navarro Blue is pretty amazing for being a slightly darker blue and is currently a top color choice, but I would love to have seen that Ara blue from the S3 be available. To me, the main reason to go up to the RS5 would be for that incredible green!

Parked next to a Range Rover the other day and checked the tire size out of curiosity. It was 275/40/22. 22! Did it look appreciably better or more unique than an SUV with 19's, 20's, or 21's? I didn’t think so.

Definitely CP on the Tundra. Toyotas, in general, are actually pretty difficult to find good value. They are cars for the ignorant masses who don’t care to do any actual research to find exactly what they need for the best value.

The design is amazing, but that is way too much money for an old vehicle that’s simply been modified.

Good point. The more I look at it, the more the steering wheel bothers me. Not good since that’s pretty much the main thing you look at in the car.

This the new Tesla coupe?

At first, I was upset at Tesla for upsetting the much more logical and better for the environment technology Toyota was spearheading with hydrogen fuel cells.