otippat
Otippat
otippat

You’re way off. Do you even enjoy videogames?  Personally I enjoy being pushed and improving in any aspect of my life, which I am satisfied with. It also adds a lot of replay value. Designing difficulty levels that doesn’t just mean tankier enemies doesn’t exists without breaking game mechanics. If you have no

And I’d say you’re normalizing people overreacting and flipping out over a bad joke because WSJ told them to.

Or how about WSJ doesn’t start this whole debacle, arguably because they should be able to handle (bad) jokes? And that they should throw down the pen if they can’t? Your whole argument can be spun the other way and it still wouldn’t make any sense.

Replace “Youtubers” with “Hollywood actors” or any group of famous

I don’t get it. One can become famous, but one cannot become unfamous. You think he’s ruining he’s reputation so people will leave him alone? Wouldn’t it just invite people to shit on him harder?

Ok. I can see how it’s silly to say “getting away” as it implies they’re doing something wrong. It’s just a poor choice of words. I think you’re overreacting to a small detail of my comment though, as I get the idea that we share the same perspective in this matter in the end from the rest of what you’re saying.
Happy

Yes, now are you a racist because of it?

I agree. They are trivializing people who actually are racists by being happy that an annoyingly successful edgelord (from their point of view) got screwed by Wall Street Journal. The comments here these last few days! Was Kotaku comments really this toxic all along? I’m inclined to believe the vast majority of the

Not bad english at all, Hideo! Nice touch after years of interviews through translators.

Like the complete opposite of Hello Games.