Clearly should have been eaten as a child.

Or better yet, “Eat the immigrant children we took from their families.”

FIGHT  EAT THE PATRIARCHY!!

I’m mad at Take Back the Night because they’re focusing on rapemen. Instead coming after us cishets you should be doing something about the damn vampires and werewolfs.

Let them eat children.

I’m sorry, but until you recognize, publicly, that ogres were eating children for YEARS before witches and warlocks ever did, I can’t view this as anything other than cultural appropriation.

but her e-meals

You don’t get it, though. You critiqued it as a satire on feminism in general, when it’s actually attacking a short-sighted flimsy application of “feminism”, not just in that Post article but any time it’s suggested we celebrate “strong women” like Gina Haspel and Megan Kelly for getting ahead in a man’s world while…

It is specifically a satire of something it seems you haven’t read:

I love Cannibal Witch because she pisses off the libtards. No, I don’t like her policy on rounding up all of our children to be eaten, but she owns the lib snowflakes so hard. They all cry and scream about their children being eaten, and I just laugh at their ridiculous faux outrage.

Why, though? They provide the context in the post. It’s clear what this is making fun of-beyond the fact that literally every Cannibal Witch post is a specific callout of some other idiotic thinkpiece. I’m struggling to see why this specific one is a Jezebel problem and not a you problem.

Maybe I don’t agree with everything Cannibal Witch says or does, maybe I don’t agree with her personal choices, but I know that Cannibal Witch will get the job done and that’s what this country needs right now. Someone strong. An outsider. Someone who can influence politics with her magical skills, not with back-alley…

Right? And what blogger/journalist/English or Communications Major hasn’t heard of A Modest Proposal? Not the right audience for that lecture, especially since Cannibal Witch is almost certainly riffing off of Swift.

I think the issue is seeing it as a satire of feminism generally, instead of specifically being a satire of Alyssa Rosenberg’s editorial in the Washington Post which there is a link to in the middle of the article. 

I read this not as satire of feminism but as satire of the Rosenberg Washington Post piece—that excusing an abhorrent position (child eating or anti-LGBTQ “morality clauses” in an employment contract) by saying “hey, but it’s great that a woman is doing something modern and non-traditional!” is ridiculous.

I’m not ready to take “funny” lessons from somebody writing a humorous-less 4 paragraph confused rant on a joke article.

Cannibal Witch 2020

This is what “lean in” was about, isn’t it? “Yes, dearie, open that oven door. And lean in.”

Technically nothing. Never wanted anything more in my life. 

If Biden throws his hat in the ring, are there any Constitutional rules that prevent, say, a former President from becoming VP?