My comment was deleted, it would appear. I will repeat.

She speaks in a polite and reasonable manner, which makes her seem as such. At least, on a very superficial level. When you break down what she's actually saying, how she's gone about getting her info, how she goes about things, and how accurate what she's saying is, her vitriol comes across a great more. It doesn't…

concise, straightforward, and completely false. She didn't do any research, she just assumed. Seriously, she only spews vitriol based an a very superficial understanding of the topic she professes to be an expert on.

Yes, she does what she does to make a profit and to make a name for herself off the things she creates. She produces only vitriol and hatred, and only has a veneer of respect for what she's talking about. Dig only slightly and you see exactly how shallow and empty her rhetoric is. Please dig a bit deeper before you…

I'm guessing from the fact you think I called her a nazi that you completely missed the point. The point being is she's about as relevant to feminism as nazis are to arguments that don't involve WWII. If you couldn't understand that, I can see why you don't understand why she's so appalling. She abuses the term…

Mentioning Anita Sarkeesian in any pro-feminism article is the equivalent of using nazis in an argument that doesn't involve WWII. Please stop using this hack as a positive resource.