ortizlgnd4-old
ortizlgnd4
ortizlgnd4-old

@wesfx: "Its a known fact that radiocarbon dating is not reliable on recent artifacts since the C-14 levels in the atmosphere have been massively effected by heavy industry and nuclear testing"

@wesfx: The point (which you're obviously missing or trying to hide) is that such calibration curves are meaningless, due to not knowing all of the conditions in the atmosphere at the time that the organism died — aswell as other factors.

@Kirkaiya: Pretty lame attempt @ sarcasm.

@Kirkaiya: Actually your statement proves how little you actually know about the bible's internal consistency. It's actually completely harmonious. You should pick up the book and do more than just read a couple pages.

@Philip.J.Fry: No friend, it wasn't a rock. It was a fragment from a recently deceased animal. Yet, carbon dating placed it as being tens of thousands of years old.

@parachoid: That was similar to the same case that I was referring to.

@Chrismsx: well stated. Thanks for rightly assuming the best — Unlike WingsofDaidalos

@WingsOfDaidalos: Why assume that that is my reason? I simply stated that if legally it must be purchased, then ALL should likewise have to purchase it.

@realfirehazard: Actually, when carefully studied, the Bible supports that the earth is MANY MANY years older than a mere few thousand. Perhaps in the millions or even billions of years old.

Too much? You can never have too much freedom. I love open world sandbox types of games.

Strains the screens hinges

@Tim: :D Its all good. Great minds think alike.

"A group was made around 27,000-26,000 years ago and the other at 32,000-30,000 years ago."

FAIL!