William Hughes! I recently read about that, and there’s another fun angle - Dec. 4 was the day that the shot-for-shot remake of Psycho came out in 1998. :)
William Hughes! I recently read about that, and there’s another fun angle - Dec. 4 was the day that the shot-for-shot remake of Psycho came out in 1998. :)
He is not sure whether his marriage involved a football move before she let herself go?
You cannot be serious!
The speech you’re looking for Yoda gave.
IBB, pickoff, IBB, pickoff, IBB, pickoff = Zero pitch inning?
All of her twists are interesting.
There’s a hole in the ... fuck it.
Always highflight truthers.
Thanks a ton for the clarifications - you really hit it with trying to find that middle ground between explaining to those in the know and coming off like you are educating kids or something. It’s a difficult task, one that translates to all kinds of domains (I work in biomedicine, and keeping track of all the modes…
Thoroughly enjoying the countdown, and I thought I’d chime in here as you just hit my number one. You are oddly dismissive of the Beastie Boys here, and while I agree that it’s the production that pushes this one into the stratosphere, crediting the album to the production team instead of the group is, um, pretty…
This isn't remotely correct: "This consistency suggests some advantage to being left-handed, otherwise evolution would have done away with it."
The "before" picture without the shadow is even better:
"Same initial feeling." Nice one.
+1
+1
Fair enough, and maybe my locus of motivation is misplaced - i.e., I may have over-stated things when I said the Bible *motivates* - as if there were some circumstance in which an innocent babe comes to the bible and is suddenly turned to a "hater." But, it does provide justificatory mechanisms, and the underlying…
That's exactly my point - that I respect the restriction in order to focus the discussion, but that the structure of the argument - let's say that X in order to Y (in this case Y being "focus the discussion") does not mean X has any validity. The problem of the matter - and what I was noting as what is really invited…
I applaud the fundamental argument here, that *even if you take the Bible to be literal and true*, the teachings indicate that the appropriate attitude towards sin of all kinds, allegedly including homosexuality, is one of acceptance, forgiveness and respect.
Um... "Crack" in the mystique?
Question - I heard all the commentator-hemming-and-hawing over whether he crossed the plane, but what about his elbow? If your elbow touches the turf, that is down, no? No idea of the timing, but I was surprised that no one mentioned it.