Your got me in the first half but I think “doing an online quiz and then voting for names I’d never heard of before” is not the solution.

You’re describing the reverse. A house is a 3D space, and to communicate this on film as best they can they use camera techniques which allow the viewer to get a sense of the space. But a film is already a series of 2D images. So how does it make sense to then translate that to 3D, when the goal is to better…

Is it cool? I don’t think it makes any sense to construct a 3D space to educate us on a 2D image.

Again don’t really know why you’re being so defensive, I thought your initial comment was repeating a (common) misconception about Australia’s healthcare system. We probably simply exist in different political circles because to me and other’s around me universal means equal and free access to all necessary medical…

Wasn't trying to be hostile but don't really know why you would call it universal if you know it's not. We don't even cover dental, they're considered luxury bones.

People missed my point, which to be fair I didn’t communicate very clearly. Almost no one within Tom Hanks wealth bracket, regardless of age, will pass away from COVID 19. Having more money than God gives you the resources to both isolate yourself from the rest of the world and gain access to the best doctors and…

Buddy I live in Australia and I'll tell you the healthcare is far from universal or without a class dynamic.

Lol “COVID survivor Tom Hanks” I don’t know if you get to take the moral high ground when you had access to the best medical treatment in the world.

Anyone looking at the upwards trajectory of covid in America and thinking they should open a movie in the next three months is insane.

Yeah, this sucks. The whole moral is that these characters are idiots and they’re doing blackface because they’re idiots, and you shouldn’t do blackface. It’s way funnier than any of the actually offensive stuff in Kimmy Schmidt.

It’s sort of insane to use language like “bury your gays” and “we’ll never erase her” here. If your show has a gay protagonist and I’m assuming other gay characters then killing off one of them is just normal CW melodrama. When are you going to kill off a gay character if you won’t do it when am actor quits? You can’t…

I suppose it's not worth repeating but what the **** happened to this website.

No more idea what goes on in his head than you do but I will reserve my right to have a laugh at famous actors.

Maybe he should be grateful he has enough money to hole up in a house for many many years and not worry about it rather than being forced to go out into the world to pay rent like 90% of the population.

Like many celebrities in these trying times I imagine he is desperately starved for attention.

You ever see a trailer for a movie these days and you just know it was put together by an algorithm?

ctrl + f “fracking”

Please, make it stop.

Without having seen the show, I’m getting pretty sick of rhetoric like “It was never about having a political ax to grind or any overt messaging. It’s more about presenting these characters as human beings.” I think we, and by we I mean the very wealthy people who work in Hollywood, need to grow up and accept the fact…

The part about Marx is really telling. The guy was asking for money to help feed his kids while he wrote the most important economic texts of all time yet he’s a “hypocrite” because he doesn’t believe in private property. This kind of smarmy, clueless moralising (“We live in a society!”) is all over the show. Here’s to…