orangeglacier--disqus
orangeglacier
orangeglacier--disqus

But does it star Roland?

I've lived in Massachusetts, Pittsburgh, Chicago, and southern California and can confirm that it wasn't a lunch staple in any of those places, so it's definitely worth an article.

The hidden room in Milla's dance party in Psychonauts takes the cake for me. I guess it's not pointless since you need to visit it to get every collectible in the game, but my god does that put such a dark spin on the character that you wouldn't see at all without visiting that room.

"Going outside the law, lynch mobbing someone, and ruining women's lives" - I don't think you understand what I'm saying. I'm saying if someone FALSELY accused me of a crime I didn't commit, I would get revenge on them. That's not a lynch mob, and that's not going out and ruining some random woman's life - that's

It's the best he can do in terms of clearing his name though. If being found not guilty (by an unsympathetic jury of white people, no less) isn't enough, what could he possibly do that would convince you he didn't commit the crime, assuming he's innocent?

For the purposes of society, "not guilty" is the closest the legal system gets to innocent. Nate Parker has been tried in a criminal trial, and found not guilty. Assuming he's innocent, what could he possibly even do to convince people, if being found not guilty is not enough? A system where the accused have no

By correcting my shorthand of "innocent" to "acquitted, not found innocent", you're certainly implying that we should ignore his acquittal and that it means nothing about his innocence.

It can be taken into account, but to what purpose? If the current comment is sensible, why does it matter if earlier comments were foolish? If the current comment is foolish, shouldn't it be easy to attack it on its own lack of merit?

Yes, I deliberately chose the provocative wording of "found innocent" rather than "found to have at least a reasonable doubt of his guilt" because "found innocent" is much quicker to say and pisses off more people. In our legal system, "not guilty" is the closest you can get to "innocent"; besides, if you really

So you wouldn't hire somebody who had been accused of a crime, and then found not guilty in a court of law?

Also, you post the last quote because it seems shocking, but think about it. People who are 70 and older don't have to live in the society their votes create. The vast majority of young Bretons, the people who will actually have to live and work in a post-Brexit world, voted to remain in the EU, and yet the elderly

Yes, and?

It means there was reasonable doubt that he committed any such crime. There doesn't seem to any reasonable doubt in the internet lynch mob condemning him.

He didn't have a victim, he was found innocent. Why would he be atoning for anything?

Great, so someone who has been duly found innocent by a court of law is now victimized by people who somehow think they know more than the jury that actually heard all the facts of the case.

This is how you get misguided movements like the MRAs - when an article like this goes out of its way to complain about the directors solely because they're white men, white men start feeling like a class that's discriminated against. Complain about white men when they do something racist or sexist. Don't villainize

It's Sir the Baptist not the Sir the Bishop, just FYI. This article could also use more pictures of the crowds - there were definitely a lot of shows like Fidlar where the chaos in the crowd would have made a much more interesting picture than the stage.

Also, I can only imagine what the midwest is like in terms of sports. I moved to Chicago recently and even in this kind of urban area it's insane how many bars are defined solely as "This is the Duke basketball team bar" or "This is official Chicago Blackhawks Bar #127" and how many bars are airing the same hockey

At the radio station at my college they'd even preempt real radio shows to cover volleyball or soccer games by the school team.

This article is the equivalent of a white person complaining about this one time a black guy called him a cracker.