Thank you for making sense.

Of course it does. Have you not witnessed human history for like, the last 400 years?

As long as he gets that promotion I’m all for it.

lol, sure man. I’m sure the 65 year old guy did so much damage /s. Obviously $160mm a year is worth more than someone getting a small bruise (if that). Let not act like some assistant producer is important.

Shut up.

lol, that had to be in a plane, right?

V or W 16 all the things??

I didn’t say there weren’t wear issues with them; the point was how much better they got to drive from the F355 up to the F430. Also the 8.5/10 take rate on the F1 does enough talking.

... a little...

“I generally dislike Gallardos”

Very true

Perhaps, though that didn’t really cross my mind.

No, the F430 one was great. You’ve obviously never driven one. Thanks for playing.

Nope, they are definitely more fun. You’ve obviously never driven one.

Lol, i was thinking the samer thing, but really, who else is trying to innovate like this? Koenigsegg is doing pneumatic valves, direct drive, hybrid drivetrains, all carbon everything. Remember the first F1 gearboxes on the 1995 F355? Those sucked too, but by the time we got the 2005 F430, they were superior to…

https://www.cars.com/vehicledetail/…

These AWD turbo ATSs are averaging like $15-16k for 50k and under miles and the 2.5s are like $12-13k. Its not even a bad car, right?

HOLY F@#$ING S@#T, I thought you were kidding. 2013 ATS 2.0 turbo with 29k miles for $13,000?!?! WHAAAAT WHAT WHAAT?

heh, I have never been on one yet. Don’t know a single person that owns one

I find the rear legroom, compared to the overall impression of the size of the car to be absolutely abhorrent. The only thing worse is an F10 5 series. I’m 5'8"; there should be no 4 door vehicle in which I can complain about rear seat space. The five series is embarrassing when it comes to leg room vs size ratio