My thoughts exactly. I was already set on buying my wife the Aviator, but was curious to see what the XT6 looked like. This makes my decision a no brainer.
i think that is an insult to volvo!
No kidding, Lincoln absolutely bitched slapped Cadillac and they just took it.
It looks like a Traverse with a CT6 front end. From the side, it just looks like a Traverse. It has the proportions of a cow. Hooray for luxury minivans sans sliding doors!
When you’re tasked to stretch a cadillac body onto a traverse architecture, passion goes right out the window.
This...? or a 450/600 HP/TQ - Hybrid... Rear Wheel Drive Based... much better looking Lincoln Aviator...... hmmmmmm....
Wow, there is no passion in this design whatsoever. Congrats Cadillac, you’ve arrived in Blandville. If I first saw this vehicle completely debadged, I might think it was a mid-cycle refresh of the Volvo XC90.
That RX-7 is also better looking than the MkIV. To be fair, I’m sure it wasn’t easy to adapt that styling to the hard points of a shared platform. Still doesn’t look all that good.
That’s just mean. The new Supra does not look like Ted Cruz!
I’m a lifelong BMW owner, underrated yes, but compared to Corvettes, Camaros and Mustangs? It’s not on that level.
Thank you. I was trying to find words for this styling mess and then you reminded me words won’t do. A star for you.
So that’s putting it in spitting distance in a segment full of pretty good cars. Corvette, Shelby GT350, Cayman to name a few in the 55-60k range and right around a few good cars at 50k ( Camaro SS 1LE and Mustang GT PP2 )
But front aerodynamic stability. No one seems to complain when Ferrari does this.
Yeesh... That front overhang looks awful.
NotFallingForItLibby4.0ConfidentMediocreWhiteMan