The main problem is that the leaders of Palistine don’t want a 2 state solution. They just want Israel gone. Israel has given land back before, and then that area becomes a base for Hamas to send rockets from. If Israel left this area alone, it would just arise somewhere else.

Call out Israel or outright wish it was gone?

Yall.

He used the same phrase as radical groups that encourage genocide.

There’s no value in going full hotep because stuff that sounds good is usually misguided bullshit. Act like you’ve never heard a Rothschild conspiracy. Bonus points if you connect it to Dr. Sebi. You might get a call from Umar Johnson himself.

Is…

The commenters have not disappointed me.

There has been armed resistance to Israel. And they keep losing. Israel is the more powerful country so they win. deal with it.

Good!

The partition plan the Palestinian leadership rejected in 1948? The partition plan the Arab states went to war over and lost in 1948 and then in 1967 when Jordan controlled the West Bank?

The Middle East, in general, was a poor investment.

mostly because Mr. Hill hates Jews.

You may want to do some research on the term anti-semetism, why it was created, and who it was applied to. Google is your friend.

His statement wasn’t nuanced thats why its problematic. 

Why would granting democratic rights to Palestinians require Israel to be destroyed in its entirety? Those are some spicy priors you’re working with.

Lib media kowtows to rightwing reactionaries, again.

How does Marc Lamont Hill propose creating a free PALESTINE from the river to the sea without eradicating Israel? How does that work? He can, “what I had meant was,” all he wants, but one is not possible without the other. This is like when white supremacists say they want a white ethnostate in the US, but that they…

Its a dog whistle. Plain and simple. Everything else he said was fine.

His speech was fine until he said “river to sea”. Thats a dog whistle used by Hamas for the destruction of Israel. The rest of his speech was fine.