“A British witch”
“A British witch”
drugs kill us in more ways than OD and pretending otherwise is so nuts it makes me want to throw my computer against the wall.
He is no different than any other immigrant. He can go through the process or he can leave.
Well, both The Onion and Jezebel.com are owned by the same company, so it wouldn’t be farfetched.
They literally said in the article “not gotten any indication that this was motivated by hate or bias.”
I hate Trump, but he doesn’t encourage this. Grow up.
this is messing up the narrative for you white people though. this guy appears to be latin american.
Yeah, people who make blind assumptions really suck.
this narrative that ever since Trump presidency that minorities aren’t safe is baloney. throughout US history there have been groups of minorities that have been targeted - this is not a new phenomenon
Maybe tell your loving and caring people to stop blowing people up?
curious how long you can wear a hijab before getting shouted down for cultural appropriation by someone
Oh, here’s another good one, just to teach you something.
I’m sorry, what? The USA’s federal crime agency statistics are “useless”? Because they disprove the fake narrative of victimhood coming out of organizations like CAIR? Really? What are they doing? Making them up, just for fun? You don’t know what you’re talking about.
The crazy thing is, the opposite is true: America is safer than ever. We get on Fox news for creating a culture of fear among their constituents, but really no media (jezebel included) is above “if it bleeds it leads” journalism.
Really? Too many who wish her harm?
Sounds like someone locked their knees.
Well perhaps it’s not the jury that was dumb, but the lawyer who was incompetent? Ever think of that? Now, I’ve served on several juries and I know far better about them than most lawyers who, by the way never served on one. That’s why so called jury experts like Dr. Phil (He was the expert for Oprah, that’s how he…
The state must prove beyond a reasonable doubt that you have a committed a crime in order for the state to deprive you of your liberty. Simple majorities leave a greater possibility that reasonable doubt exists in a case that results in a conviction. This is all born from the notion that it is better for an guilty…
And you’re an elitist asshole. You have no idea what went on in that jury room, and to make a blanket statement about people at large and to hint at interfering with civil rights based on your idea of intelligence is dangerous. And stupid.
What does that help? Were you privy to all the trial materials, do you know what information and evidence was brought forth? What was dismissed?