Could be!

I agree on every point.

Umm. Non-developer, normal web-surfer person here. This all seems like a lot of hoo-ha for nothing. I’m using explorer, and an srware iron (basically an old chrome, I think), I have firefox, but never really use it. I think everything’s fine. It all works. If I never needed to ‘upgrade’ (I wouldn’t know if it’s really…

I don’t know. I was once stranded 4 hours in the rural english countryside on a commuter train because a tractor hit a bridge. And at least in the 90's, the Paris subway was....stabby.

And I hope that you’re right, but from the congressional hearings I’ve seen, that’s what they’re interested in. Doesn’t mean it will happen, but that’s what they act like they would like to see, and Booker acted like he would like to see that come to pass, too.

low quality of urban schools? exurban sprawl? That’s not the car, that’s racism. True, cheap cars made it easier to move out of the cities, but white flight took (and still takes) place because of racism, not for the love of cars.

No, I’m a Hillary supporter. But I thank you for this opportunity. RANT mode activated:

I know this is going to sound weird, but:

You backtrack and minimize your criticism of course. The guy has been in politics for over 40 years, you think he doesn’t know how to do that?

But those damn strings are so painful when they get stuck in your teeth.

Well, shit. What am I supposed to do for righteous indignation now? We both feel like the other candidate has problems that the other side won’t acknowledge, and that our candidate is better. That’s elections, I guess. No foul there.

Ok. My bad.

Well of course you can. And in the case of Verizon, you might have a meritorious claim if they produced a product that lent itself to anonymous harassing of others. There have probably already been lawsuits based on the same fact pattern. Regarding Coors, you could, but you would likely get thrown out on summary…

That’s funny, that sounds like a compromise position. He had higher priorities than being anti-Iraq war, but was forced to vote for or against a funding bill that has always passed with 90%+, against his principles? Who made him do that?

Then how do you explain the times he didn’t vote to fund?

Regarding gun manufacturers, I agree with you more than I disagree. The problem I have is granting special status where they may not be sued. Fast food joints have been sued for making kids fat, and the suits get thrown out, exotic car companies get sued when some lunatic gets behind the wheel and goes 110 down city…

Ha! I agree. Leave it to us Democrats to risk wandering in the desert for 40 years over whether or not 12 or 15 is sufficient. The bonus irony is that neither probably are, or both probably are, depending upon where you live.

Maybe. But for crying out loud, maybe it should. Ok, fine, if he doesn’t lose NY by a landslide, let’s see how PA and the rest of them go the next week, but at some point, you’re either helping or hurting.

“The fact remains that they ARE playing by the same tort rules as all other manufacturers”

I don’t hate Sanders, Longsnake. I hate the fact that your side of the aisle presents him as Christ incarnate without acknowledging his flaws, or even worse, defending the indefensible hill.