ongreystreet
OnGreyStreet
ongreystreet

That’s what I was thinking. At least they made Swinton’s character Celtic instead of an Asian character played by a very white person? I find that I’m relatively okay with this. But I’m a white person, so what do I know?

But come on: here’s a country of one billion people who you see as so powerful that you’ll change a character’s ethnicity to fit your perceptions of their taste, but who you also see as so incredibly stupid that merely “acknowledging that Tibet is a place” will render them so apoplectic with politicized rage that

So what? No, really. Who does that hurt? No one. They’ve been together for more than 15 years. Something real is there. It’s not for us to say that’s wrong. It’s not wrong. It’s just not what we personally might do.

Who is “preying”? mid 20s is a grown ass adult.

It’s a little weird but who cares? And the fact that they’ve been together for 15 years kind of speaks to the fact that it isn’t just a boy toy situation.

isn’t how freedom of speech works

Ironically I’ve been reading TRP on and off for a couple months. I don’t usually Reddit at all, but I’ve been researching for a project.

I’m not sure about the evolution thing. There are many factors that make someone sexually unappealing to people around them that have nothing to do with genetic traits. Also, people with “unappealing” genetic traits can overcome them and still breed. If I’m genetically predisposed to becoming fat, which I am actually,

So, “Straight White Male” here with no particular affiliation with these groups.

Oh man I wish I had a dollar for everyone that thinks a private organization has 1st Amendment duties. Why does no one know the 1st Amendment is to protect you from the GOVERNMENT not reddit.

“Give it a rest,” said the guy who devotes an entire post to trotting out as many month-old Hogan sex tape jokes as humanly possible.

The primary defect of The Red Pill is that most of the people who control where that dialogue goes have been evolutionarily deselected by women for not being interesting, attractive, empathic, masculine, kind, thoughtful, or successful

While gawker trying to take the moral high ground is always laughable, this has absolutely zero to do with the first amendment, other than that people who don’t understand it will inevitably bring it up in the comments.

The word “should” here is referring to the moral obligation of large media networks. They didn’t call for anyone to be jailed over the issue, so “freedom of speech” is completely off-topic.

“Why don’t they like me? I hate all the right people!”

Freedom of speech means that the government can’t imprison you for your opinions. It has nothing to do with the discourse that companies choose to allow on their social media websites.

I miss Superior Spider-Man. Easily one of my favorite runs of the webhead of all time.

Reddit has no obligation to do anything, but you lecturing people on how the 1st amendment works is pretty rich considering your understanding of it is pretty flawed.

“Superior” was soooooo good.

People forget that Spider-Man is super strong, like, able to lift 20 tons strong.