This would be an excellent solution, but I wouldn’t cry if the little shit who shared the video on snapchat saw a couple months in juvie.
This would be an excellent solution, but I wouldn’t cry if the little shit who shared the video on snapchat saw a couple months in juvie.
The issue is he circulated video of it, presumably without her consent. Even if we assume she was in the state of mind where she could’ve given consent, which is possible, do you think she was okay with having all that filmed and passed around?
I don’t think either of those things are true, but that won’t stop Trump from giving it a shot. He’s already had his surrogates floating the idea for a few weeks. That’s why he’ll go soft on Sanders and focus on attacking Clinton.
Think of the bigger picture and the current state of the Democratic primary. Sanders is hanging on by saying he should be the nomineed because he’s the stronger general election candidate based on polling. He’s also continued to feed the “democratic primary is rigged” conspiracy theories. Trump loves those and feeds…
Then why agree to the debate? There’s no upside from a Democratic perspective. No matter what the outcome, it weakens Clinton, which might sound swell for the Sanders camp until you remember mathematical reality and the sheer questionable ethics of circumventing your actual opponent. I don’t think he cares who they…
Trump wants to win over Sanders supporters. His team has been working at that for a few weeks now. If anything, he’ll try to make it a lovefest. The question is whether Sanders will fall for it.
“You know, like when the blood comes out of their wherevers. Those kinds of issues.”
The only issue I can see is that Trump badly wants to woos Sanders’ supporters. Sanders wants to gain more support going into the California primary for an upset. What are the odds these two are actually going to go after each other? I’d say minimal. Instead, they’ll likely spend an hour and a half taking pot shots at…
That’s exactly why I sincerely don’t believe it’ll stick or have any meaningful, lasting effects. You’d have to go back and re-write almost all of his 616 timeline. My bet is it’s some con.
He has enemies who can control minds, and a few years back the Red Skull had control of his body. This is hardly the first time Cap’s been temporarily Nazi’d as a twist.
It feels like they’ve run out of things to do with him, which is a real shame. He can be an interesting character.
It’s like people forget that one time they had to explain Cap being written as an absolute dick for ages by saying his body had been taken over by the Red Skull. Or the time Cap straight up died.
Isn’t he though? The best parts of any Thor movie or Thor-related scene (mug smashing, Loki smashing, etc) come from embracing the sheer camp of it all.
The sheer leaps of faith it’s taken at certain levels (Guardians of the Galaxy for example) are especially impressive. Not all the movies are great, but the end result is that you can have movies like Civil War which deliver emotional gut punches from a dude in a robot suit and a guy who once sold war bonds.
Isn’t that what the Sanders campaign has been trying to do for the past couple months, sway the supers? Even the NV fracas was started by the Sanders team trying to organize more delegates than Clinton so they could try to flip the state to Sanders after Clinton won. Hell, just running as a Dem even though you hate…
There would be a giant shitstorm over the guy who denounced superdelegates for dubverting the democratic process then using them to subvert the democratic process. Unfortunately since this Nevada thing he’s been losing a few.
How would you suggest she earn it? When she pushes further left, she’s lying and flipflopping. When she says he should stay in the race till the end, she’s lying. When she says there’s a place for everyone in the party and we should come together, she’s being condescending.
Sander’s official statement essentially says that the DNC has this coming, the establishment is lying about any violence happening, if maybe violence were happening that wouldn’t be good, but the other side did it first so it’s justified.
But why educate people when you can blame it on ELECTION FRAUD and justify all the shitty behavior? If you actually educate people, you have to admit that you were trying to game the system and subvert the popular vote of a state even though you’re a “revolution of the people.”
The supporters you attract and the behavior you encourage reflects upon your campaign’s message. How you handle things like this reflects upon you as a candidate. In the case of Trump, the Klan members are flocking to him because he encourages them by retweeting their stuff and campaigning on racism. He even appointed…