Yeah, I think the replies you’ve received from elunty and LazyBookWyrm pretty much sum it up. Shitting on someone just for being who they are.

So your plan is to systematically exclude people because it’s inconvenient for a select group of players to allow them to play?

Uh, given how fast Woot sells out, is posting articles about their sales really helpful?

Uh, given how fast Woot sells out, is posting articles about their sales really helpful?

Same. At least I saved you a bit of time.

Unfortunately, these are only available for streaming immediately, it appears. So no adding them to your collection for later.

Or, maybe, people will enjoy fights that require skill and tactics instead of simple numbers and patterns.

There’s no justifiable reason for Sanders to remain in the race

My hope is for a bit of the Indiana Jones-styled adventure map travel conceit. A big open map with locations on it, red arrows drawing across the map with some sepia cutscenes in the background showing travel progress, and treat each location as an open world area to explore. It’d balance the overall size of the world…

I’m trying to decide which is more annoying. That there’s a Kotaku employee whose situation is perfect for reviewing something like this, or that the fat jokes in the comments ignore the disabled gamer crowd.

So, you’re stating my point for me: Epic is using a lure (up front cash) to convince developers to exclusively use the Epic store, and thus preventing them from using other stores even if it turns out that such exclusivity generates bad press, is detrimental to sales, and offers no real benefits other than that up…

Bang has some decent sugar free flavors lurking in their offerings. I avoid most of them, though. Some people will drink anything 

Reading comprehension, my dude, the two statements are in no way contradictory. “Binding a developer to an exclusivity contract” means what it says: once the decision has been made by a developer, they are bound to it, regardless of whether or not it turns out to have been a good idea. They no longer have a choice for…

Who said it wasn’t? But that doesn’t make it any less of a predatory action on Epic’s part, either.

With literal actual contracts. What part of that is hard to wrap your head around? The developers already get to live with both the stigma of a delayed release after the hype has died down on top of a year's worth of sales due to a lack of more general availability. Epic is making the anticompetitive, anticonsumer…

Origin is EA’s own games. They don’t pay for exclusives. GOG and Steam do not pay for exclusives; any games that are exclusive to the platforms are due solely to choice by the developers. There is a world of difference between a developer choosing a single storefront and a storefront binding a developer to an…

I honestly don’t care how many free games they give away. I have a large library across multiple services as it is, and prefer to spend mine on services that don’t enforce exclusivity contracts on developers.

TETSUOOOO!

That’s actually probably the part that bothered me the most, really. Rather than going with an original story or a straight remake of any of the previous stories, they went with a “greatest hits” compilation with a loose narrative tying things together. It simultaneously had no new ideas and failed to really deliver…

I mean, you don’t have to. Just Google “lean pockets discontinued.” The first five results are from the Hot Pockets website, all from the customer reps, all stating that they’ve been discontinued.

The best flavors are being converted to HP flavors, so there’s that, but yeah.