onetrueping
Michael Anson
onetrueping

Epic is currently throwing around their money to make games exclusive to build interest in their store. What if, instead of spending money on exclusives, they let the publishers publish where they want, but discount the games and pay the publishers the difference? The publishers still get the money, the game is

Considering how most MMOs dole out soulless fetch quests through random NPCs, it has more to do with the quest design rather than the source. Rather than dotting the landscape with random NPCs giving out the same quests over and over, Bethesda set up a limited event using a single NPC that reskins that kind of game

It’s not that they have a store, but that they provide the services of a store. If your website provides the same services as a place of public access, it would be covered by this interpretation. That includes Amazon.com, which does not have a physical location, but provides multiple services that are typically

Pretty much the only counterpoints I’ve seen are “you’re just a Steam fanboy who’s butthurt.” Nobody is actually taking the time to address legitimate complaints.

Nope, that’s GOG.

Let me remind you that being an absolute idiot outside your area of expertise doesn't mean you are an absolute idiot inside of it. Ben Carson is a shitty politician and a brilliant brain surgeon.

If I remember correctly, the predominant ratio was 4:3, not 3:2. 3:2 would be a new ratio for displays, being between 4:3 and 16:9.

At release, you could either see what was going on or shoot, not both. I believe that was changed in a later patch, after it was fixed in a fan mod.

Dream scenario: they gain controlling stakes in all of the for-profit prisons and start shutting them down, single-handedly destroying the kids-for-cash industry.

That is the voice of frustration. It’s okay, Gita, it’s all going to be okay!

The discussion here is specifically about fictional buildings, such as those portrayed in science fiction films and the like, but I appreciate the suggestion. The ADA sadly does not apply to fictional spaces. The idea is to make such features so ridiculously common that they are second nature when designing fictional

It is questionable whether amending the cut would actually assist developers, given that most developers are paid by contract before the game is ever put up for sale. It would assist publishers, however, though only with direct sales.

The last episode is where they ran out of budget. In fact, it’s the reaction to that episode that led to the End of Evangelion movie, which shows what actually happens while Shinji is having his impressionistic fever dream.

I’m honestly not sure. All I was able to glean from the thread was that different character builds (classes, etc) had different patterns and styles, which already sounds well thought out, and it somehow all fit into what was going on. My sister is the Raveler, so my knowledge is mostly second-hand.

If you cannot see how Trump’s actions, slogans, and rallies inherently make a majority people who are gay, brown, or female incredibly uncomfortable, then perhaps you should be staying away from groups who are predominantly composed of these groups of people.

Trump support was specifically banned for making the place hostile to large groups of people. Strangely, people of other ideologies weren't anywhere near as abrasive about it.

Yeah, Ravelry has a pretty big group of punk knitters, bikers, etc. Even a group that plays RPGs through scarves.

These things don’t change who you are, but they do change the environment you live and grow in. It’s not the characteristic itself but the general reaction to the characteristic that molds the character.

In the original art for the game, and comparing game models, yes, she was somewhat busty, but they never really drew attention to it. The characteristic was further cemented by the various spinoffs, cameos, and other official artwork.

You live closer to the equator than folks whose heaven has but one day and one night per year.