Like Leia?

Because they don’t accurately model the heavens you see?

I’d love to, but it seems this version of the flowchart is just too small to read from.

Triangle man, triangle man
Tired of the antics of Florida man
They get in a fight
Internet wins
Florida man

As a Keen fan, I give zero shits about this game. As should you. That’s my beef, you’re being toxic about something you should honestly not care about. This thing existing should have zero bearing on your life, so why the hell are you so angry about it?

Because people who post negative comments online are the entire market, just like all the people who hate Apple products, predicted World of Warcraft was failing after Cataclysm, or that women characters in games are the worst thing ever. The ONLY barometer for the market is the number of units sold.

That is some lightning fast polling you’ve got there! We get it, you don’t care about this game. It’s been demonstrated that there is a market, and that that market would likely have been watching. That market isn’t you.

Or it would be like a developer showing their kid-targeted game to people who played the original game, are Apogee/id software fans, and happen to have kids, who would be watching the conference from home.

Small children.

Those people have kids. Shocking, I know, but that’s who they were marketing to.

Commander Keen was the first game on PC that could smoothly scroll in four directions. It’s notable for that specific reason. The intention was actually to get permission to use the tech in porting Nintendo games to the PC.

Probably related to the train graveyard or something.

So asthma-like symptoms directly correlated to exposure to thirdhand nicotine from vaping doesn’t count. Got it.

You aren’t familiar with COPPA laws, are you. I can’t link directly to specific cases because you cannot share information of children under the age of 12. Instead, I linked specifically to articles showing that vaping does leave nicotine residue, that said nicotine residue does have effects on children including…

So, I linked some articles you might want to read in the thread.

Adding a few more: https://www.medicalnewstoday.com/articles/272425.php

So, is there a rule somewhere that only one study can be done on a topic? Last I checked, it was not only possible but encouraged for further research to test or even contradict existing information. The article references a study regarding specifically secondhand vaping done more recently, plus case studies regarding…

The source was the nighttime director for a local hospital, a bit hard to reference on here. The problem here is you run into issues with COPPA, which makes it hard to refer to specific cases. Generally, though, the issues were associated with faulty devices.

So, first, I feel the snap-related assessment is too focused on resource consumption. Think of everything that requires human monitoring to not go wrong. All manner of moving vehicles. Chemical plants. Nuclear reactors. Military facilities. The list goes on and on. Now think of all those facilities that require…

There’s a real issue here with second-hand nicotine contact. Specifically, exhaled nicotine can coat surfaces near the vaper, which can lead to contact by other people. This has led to nicotine overdoses in very young children, who have been hospitalized as a result.