On the response from the trans-woman over this.

I am trans myself and I really feel for her. But she is not entirely correct. What she says is true for her and a lot of trans women, but not all of us. Many of us are very open about being trans the way this character seems to be, likewise many of us simply do not have a…

Your probably right, but equally a great deal of bad writing is so obviously bad without any links to anything that if a comment is too badly written and seems pertinent to a relatively current event its going to set people off like a plausible conspiracy theory.

Smart people can comment intelligently without having to resort to using the lazy crutch that is using “SJW” as a criticism.

According to the article it’s a NPC that only mentions it in a one off conversation after further prodding by the PC.

The gist? Some people feel like Mizhena’s dialogue, the aforementioned ethics dig, and writer Amber Scott’s unabashed stance on all of it constitute the bold outline of a blatant political agenda.

This is a prime example of how many gamers don’t actually know what they really want out of the industry as a whole.

You’re right, you not understanding the meaning of words is my fault. Man, I gotta go back to argumentation school.

Funny how people want to defend developers as untouchable “arteests” whose vision should never be questioned, unless that vision includes diversity for women/LGBTQ/POCs, and then it’s just “SJW pandering.”

It kinda is though. She can write whatever she wants. Back to the dictionary, maybe?

Game Maker: “We have listened to fan complaints and have changes some aspects of our game accordingly.”

So GGs were complaining about censorship in Nintendo games, and now want Baldur’s Gate to be censored.