old-shuck-ate-bob-d
old Shuck ate bob_d
old-shuck-ate-bob-d

Also, “planned” is not the same as “actually went through with it when they saw the price.”

If 75% of people they surveyed were PC gamers, then the figures are a lot lower than 15%. “Privately held media services agency Horizon Media, Inc. ....polled 3,000 people reflective of the United States population, found that a full two-thirds of consumers are completely unaware of the technology.”

Good points. The only VR I am still considering for this year is SONY’s. If the price is right, I’ll bite. Other than the $60 PlayStation Eye, I already met the hardware requirements ;)

Video games may be the only thing Scalia did right since Reagan appointed him. Other less amazing stances:

And, really, zombie apocalypse preparedness is a key issue that the other candidates have failed to address.

I prefer to keep it simple and just call them hypocrites.

No, that gives her too much credit. She’s someone who’s willing to peddle the same lies about business and economics as Republicans because, to her, they’re secondary to her faith-based horseshit about gay folk and women.

It’s scary how easy it is to bring the worst out of us isn’t it?

Exactly! The issue isn’t necessarily Trump himself, the issue is the many people who actually LIKE the crap that is spewing from his mouth. And his support just grows after every crass and assholish statement. I do fear my fellow Americans. And I hate to bring up the Nazi thing, but I no longer question how Hitler got

Hey, look at that. Supporting #GamerGate didn’t help them.

And thank slack for that. It was recently taught in a class on dystopias at my university. For some reason the students can relate to it much more easily than 1984 or Brave New World.

Also, ‘only good guys with guns can stop bad guys with guns’, 350+ chances for a law-abiding civilian with a gun to prove this statement to be something than utter bullshit this year and so far......bupkis.

Yeah, I don’t know the specifics of the situation I was reading about but I know there are loopholes in what falls under “domestic violence that would keep you from getting a gun” and what we colloquially call domestic violence. I think it can even go as far as to be whether it’s any physical altercation or whether

I actually had to look it up because I know the specifics of what constitutes “domestic violence” vary from state to state, but it appears that all state laws just make things harsher some going as far as saying any physical contact during an altercation, even if it doesn’t meet the standards of other crimes involving

Form 4473 (the form to purchase a firearm) line i “Have you ever been convicted in any court of a misdemeanor crime of Domestic Violence.” Under the Domestic Violence Offender Gun Ban if she had pressed charges he would not have been allowed to buy the firearm. Of course there’s nothing that would have stopped him

Trumpland, Trumpland über alles! Über alles in der Welt!

I can’t get through half of that without hysterics.

His sample size of one doesn’t hold up well against the evidence.