lol, because “gay” is the worst thing that could ever happen to a kid.

Any sympathy I had for her, and I was one of those hold-outs who preached empathy, blah blah etc., has evaporated in reading this news. You’re on your own M-Tru.

I’m with you. I think they both despise each other but she’s just as greedy, ruthless & proud as any other Trump.

I don’t know about the circumstances of her marriage or what goes on behind closed doors, and I’ll leave speculation to others. But in public she has revealed herself to be little more than a petulant bully, willing to use her platform as First Lady to cajole anyone who crosses her. If I was to wish being married to…

BUT SHE WANTED CHILDREN TO EAT BETTER AND GET MORE EXERCISE! What kind of monster wants THAT?

Can we all agree that Melania is no captive victim here? She may despise her disgusting beast of a husband, but she’s in on the insanity all the same.  

Daily fucking reminder:

Ignore this person. They are Kinja Cliche #47 - the hateful scornbeast. Your response will now be met with insults and a bunch of MRA red piller fucktardity.

The best part is, it’s widely reported in the UK that the Obamas and Windsors adored each other, no matter what Fox bullshits.

If Trump thinks he has it bad over here, it is going to be 10x worse over there. The public is allowed to get ridiculously close in England, the first thing he will see out the window of AF1 will be protests and every second on the ground will be people yelling at him. He will be forced to see the hatred for him.

For a second I forgot she was dating someone other than John Mayer, and I was going to remind you that YOU CAN DO BETTER*

I didn’t give her much thought until the campaign. I don’t care for her music but I’ll pay for it just to support her voice. She has an impact on young fans, and they need her.

She’s gone blonde, by the way. I think it suits her.

I feel like most of these people are well known within the sci-fi community, but not at large. 9 times out of 10, your average layman on the street, the first name that pops in their head is gonna be H.G. Wells or Asimov. I like that you put Mary Shelley there though. I had not even thought about putting Frankenstein…

True. This isn’t fair of me, but of all the markets Vogue could have waded into in the Middle East or the Maghreb...I wish it wasn’t targeting Saudi Arabia and Dubai with a Saudi princess at the helm.

Entirely anecdotal, but once, years ago, I was at Harrods (London) - I wasn’t there doing anything fancy; just buying some good tea - and a huge limo parked outside and about seven women in full burkas came in through the doors with two enormous body guards. I was very into photography at this point and found this…

Case in point, to support your wonderful comment: She did not want her picture featured in 2004 out of concern for the safety of her family. Her husband told her to do it, so she did.

She is gorgeous, sounds sharp, is getting a great opportunity and clearly making the most of it, but there is, under the surface, a deep…

No, you’re right. It’s not strange for her to defer in political matters. It just makes the whole piece farcical as it’s intended to promote the “modern, Muslim woman”, but actually she can’t talk about politics because her husband is part of a theocratic family that rules with absolute power over their own…

I wouldn’t be a princess either, most likely, but that doesn’t mean that the non-princess “Arab” woman can’t have a life of meaning, value, and happiness. This is part of the problem, people view women in the Muslim world as victims only, nothing else.

is it? i see where you’re coming from but considering who her husband is, it’s probably smart for her not to wade into things too deeply.