Just spitballing here, Elizabeth Warren, Mark Bennett, Gillibrand, Booker, Castro, O’Malley. I’m sure there’s more. Why were they all essentially locked out in favor of Clinton?

No, I simply am saying Hillary is a terrible candidate with limited appeal that the entire Democratic party anointed from Day 1, making it virtually impossible for other candidates to have a shot. Hell Sanders, a fringe protest candidate at best,  almost beat her anyways. Imagine if say Warren just for an example, or…

Running a shitty candidate solely on the basis that he’s “not the other guy” is a great way to lose a winnable election. (See Dole ‘96, Kerry ‘04, McCain ‘08, Romney ‘12.) If the Democrats lose this one it’s their own damned fault for trotting out another Clinton.

Yeah like Hillary Clinton is not physically , intellectually, and morally repugnant give me break. Let’s face it both candidates are horrible and neither one of them has any business being President. It is like South Park has been saying this year we have a choice between a giant douche or turd sandwich.

It’s funny - you sound exactly like the BBC’s panel of experts, confidently quoting polls showing a 52-48 vote for Britain to stay in Europe right before the counting started!