ohtoronto
ohtoronto
ohtoronto

That's ridiculous. Did they see your ring and say "oh, I see you're owned by a man. Could you put him on the phone?"

"Barthel reduces racial discourse and demand for justice to 'feelings.'" Jezebel reduces racial discourse to feelings all the time, cf. the essay you just published this morning.

1. Author does not know what to do with good white people.

Canada has less racially charged public discourse because it's far more white than the US and has a far weaker, more cowardly media.

Do you know anything about either antitrust law or contract law or intellectual property law, or are you just spouting off?

Lie and say he has a compromised immune system and can't play with unvaccinated kids.

Hot take.

Her point was that we shouldn't profile but she only got to that point by assuming herself that two young black men in a store were doing something wrong.

That's a definite no. The moral of that movie is that young black men who are good at sports deserve to be 'saved.'

They have since dropped that policy and don't care now.

Alienating is saying something like: "No one cares about your white woman fee fees, brah."

Yeah, and unfortunately Jezebel has the only active permit to run a women-oriented blog and the all-white counsel that reviews these matters isn't going to meet against until 2016.

Are you saying there's a correlation between mathematical skills and early childhood risk-taking based on two examples? Good thing you're a mech eng PhD and not a statistics PhD.

Men also die earlier on average than women, and though they attempt suicide less often, complete it at a greater rate. Men: better at murder, better at suicide, better at misadventure, better at natural causes.

You're winning a lot of converts with your unbridled hostility, friend.

You would prefer he said "you're impairing my ability to breathe" before he died of compression of his chest and throat?

The problems that can arise when you don't do any real work.

He could use the royal hair doctor to have the plugs put in so gradually that it wouldn't be noticeable. If ever asked, years from now, he could say he switched to eating more fish or something and that made all the difference.

"We have come to the conclusion that our trust in her was misplaced" is fairly clear cut. Discrepancies in her account amount to the event she said happened didn't occur when she said it happened, could not have occurred then because no one was pledging, and the person with whom it occurred apparently did not exist.

The only likely reason she's not doubling down is because she now has no leg to stand on. In the "idiots" piece, apart from the inflammatory head, she goes to town in the comments section on one of the guys she has called an idiot in the story. A proper apology would be a stand alone blog piece saying "I was wrong" in