ohoyotohbi
Ohoyo Tohbi
ohoyotohbi

They showed me Arabelle's picture due to her passing of kidney failure in October followed by the one of her urn of ashes. It startled me, too. I get their point but for too long, Facebook has been exclusively one-sided in community expression in my opinion. Not every thing is something to "Like" so for balance (and

Quick story. Last year on Christmas day, the lady in the apartment above me stomped into her child's bedroom (which happens to be directly above my bedroom) about 2 o'clock in the afternoon and screamed out, "YOU ARE THE MOST UNGRATEFUL, SPOILED LITTLE CHILD! Go to bed, NOW!" Pretty sure the kid was just about 3 years

Pretty sure this is precisely why one of my aunts has mailed out Christmas Letters every year since she adopted my cousin. This year it changed from "X's Letter" to "The Y Family Letter" because he's off in college and they're now empty-nesters. :)

Marketing. This girl should go into marketing.

No because there's no need for it. You may think it's silly. I don't. That's the power of choice and it cuts both ways. It's been four hours. Let's leave the opposing sides where they are because they aren't changing and there's nothing more to say except people can express differences of opinion.

It's worthless when it presents a potential risk to an infant with no say in the matter because they are completely dependent upon the mother. I never said they were frivolous nor did I say that I personally have no use for alcohol. That was you putting words into my mouth. Sure, many people can enjoy it for many

It's both and I've never said otherwise. That was my point, that there is both a professional and personal element to my initial statement. So now we've come full circle, so what? There's no excuse, other than personal choice, to expose an infant to alcohol. None. No benefit and no purpose aside from the mother's

OMG, tears.

Conversely, it could be said that of course a mother has the potential to drink alcohol while lactating, also while eating inorganic double bacon cheeseburgers outside after having just driving with road rage. The child doesn't have a choice. The opposing argument would introduce an adult regulated substance into an

That's fine and yet that obviously does not cover the entirety of infants subjected to this, against their will by the way, whereas zero consumption does.

No, it's not and you didn't answer my question, either. This isn't going to devolve into pitting one side against the other and it's doubtful any positions will be changed. Some may agree, some won't. Even still, we can still state them and that's how this started. If there's an impasse, it really doesn't have to go

This discussion isn't about eliminating all risk from parenting; it's about this issue specifically.

Let me ask you a question. Can you explain to me why a mother would even take that chance of risk, however small, other than to fulfill selfish gratification because she wanted a drink or two? Make those adult choices on your own time, not the kid's. Unless of course they're going to perform an analysis immediately

If for some reason it wasn't clear before, "findings suggest X, but I still recommend Y" is exactly what the case is when I'm asked about further information. Surely not all patients are going delve into all of the literature but also they are not always going to follow their health provider's instructions to the

FP and that is not soley what I base any advisement on; there's also the element of experience. What I do not support is, in this very specific instance of alcohol and breastfeeding, why even remotely introduce that risk to a child, even minutely? Again, people make their own choices that they and sometimes their

I did not say that I'd deny the science. Also, I didn't specify that it was the science, exactly, that I couldn't wrap my head around. No. There's a distinction between denial of it and not supporting it. As I said, adults are free to both make their own choices and voice their own opinions.

It's not an attitude. It's both my personal and professional stance on the matter. Adults are free to make their own choices and equally to state their own opinions, as I did.

Your example arguments and mine are not the same. I understand your point however, they aren't the same. Abstaining from alcohol, in this instance, removes any possibility of impact to the infant. There is nothing wrong with a zero percent chance in this case. I would never deny a person who asked if there was further

If a person refrains, then there is no need for concern either way in the first place. Others may be comfortable with it. I'm not. To each, their own.

I get the math. I really do. But just, no. This is a HUGE soapbox issue of mine, both with friends/family and with patients, and I just can't wrap my head around it. Nope.