Should not we all metaphorically poop in a Capitalist’s suitcase?

I’m going to add that Doctor Strange 2 came on the heels of Spiderman: No Way Home, in which we saw the titular hero bend over backwards to save not just 1, but 5 super villains from their own evil tendencies.

Armond was rebelling against something much bigger than Jake. Jake just wanted people who served him to remain in their place. Armond is an anti-capitalist hero. We need monuments for him.

One thing I like about Mike White’s shows is that while they are pretty brutal in showing everyone’s flaws, they also tend to have an enormous amount of empathy for the whole person...even for characters that other writers/shows use as punching bag villains. The couple opposite of Aubrey Plaza, for example, can…

The list and the criteria are a bit wack but I feel like Kilgrave should be higher. His aims were banal but his methods were so terrifying. The idea of his mind control and how it’s described, that’s such a violation. Being forced to do something terrifying or painful while a corner of your mind screams in horror,…

Is there anything less interesting than a thing that makes a hero character eeeeeeeevil

I watched WandaVision right before Doc Strange 2, and was like oh, ok, we’re doing this now. That lady’s a bad guy now.

The character that had a mental breakdown questioning everything she was doing in life when she accidentally killed a dozen people in Age of Ultron now just straight up murdering hundreds of people felt a little rushed yeah.

No one here knows either one of them, so that’s not an argument, but that doesn’t mean that we can have some kind of empathy and sympathy for her and discuss how Beatty was a known creep and therefore could’ve done these things. I really don’t get why this is so hard for you to process. Saying again, if you want to…

Scarlet Witch should have been the most compelling villain if they didn’t decide to do such a rush job on her after Wandavision. This show about trauma in conflict with the prescribed forced and linear narratives of happiness causing serious harm to the individual and those around them, counter balanced with her…

I don’t know or necessarily care about this case.

Really? How come your knee jerk reaction is questioning her case and the point of it and the usual “she’s in it for the money” instead of actually offering any kind of sympathy and support for the victim? Or questioning Warren Beatty? And how you dismissed everyone’s valid points to you that given his reputation and…

Hey, remember that movie where a cop who sexually assaults a woman during a traffic stop isn’t all THAT bad because he doesn’t also let her burn to death after a car accident?

I bet there was a day in 1973 in which your age changed. Remembering whether something happened before or after that specific day may be difficult.

You can’t prove that the car wasn’t going too fast because she was chasing it like the T-1000 she really is.

Which... that’s how real art gets made, by bewildered rich people willing to pay for what they don’t understand. Art, and vespa rentals I guess. 

Well, I for one am totally unshocked that someone called Elvis316 is on the side of the old dude alleged to have had sex with a 14 year old ...

She lived with it because there was little recourse for people in her position until now. Maybe you’ll have better luck interacting with other people if you don’t exude more unpleasantness than a dripping trash bag.

File this one under “Yeah, that sounds about right.”

You really find it hard to believe that known lothario Warren Beatty molested a teenager in the seventies, when that kind of shit was rampant and chalked up to the “sexual revolution”?  Surprised she’s the only one, to be honest.