Um. The whole of the UK, it's a major newspaper.

Uh, this is more like having attended any one class during their college period. The figure isn't exactly outlandish.

“bisexual" relationship

the word u were looking for is "bisexual"

1: The issue is with things that ALREADY communicate with u

Plz Google "psychological benefits of pets", then choose a different analogy

Why wasn't this dismissed with prejudice, anyone?

1: what hardship

But that doesn't help. All it does is maybe keep ONE child safe, this one. What about all the other children reading those books whose parents don't think about this?

There is currently no evidence that any creature down to about the complexity of crustaceans lacks the neurology necessary for consciousness, according to a consensus statement of leading researchers in the field - the Cambridge Declaration on Animal Consciousness.

Great analogy, except, um, yeah it does - that's the case for addiction to antidepressants, for example.

There’s a series of studies started by Malamuth in the eighties that suggest that you are judging some rapists too harshly. Malamuth found - and this has been well-replicated - that about a third of college-age males simply don’t know how to avoid raping someone.

Hi! Yes, that was very silly of you. In linguistics we call this “prescriptivism” - it’s classist, ableist, sexist, based on a total misconception of what language is, is one of the few things that could actually kill language as a whole, and, as a bonus, has been mocked from as far back as the inventor of the first…

Hot dogs, steamed broccoli and ramen is not "an entire meal"

I have bitten into a bay leaf that should have been strained out of a soup. It's unpleasant, to say the least.

1: you are generalising plot elements too broadly. At the level of analysis you are using there’s only a couple of dozen actual plots at most, all of which were used long ago. Stories are different because of the details - the underlying structure at this level of abstraction doesn’t change much.

Hi! Just wanted to let you know you’ve become everything you hated.

This seems ghoulish and disrespectful. Presumably by the 500th anniversary we will be digging it up and putting on a puppet show with his skeleton. And by the 600th it will be a puppet show of Titus Andronicus.

Did someone challenge the editorial staff to write a headline that was the exact opposite of clickbait?

If you think things with only a psychological need for them aren’t paid for by insurance, is it because you have forgotten mental health, or because you actually think insurance doesn’t fund it?