Oh yeah, that did seem weird at that time, forgot about that.

Ok, that's not punk, but that was awful weird. Or just awful, rather.

That is hilarious. Well, I guess there was some sort of precedent with the Ramones covering "I don't Wanna Grow Up."

Er, it was up his nose for couple minutes, but sure, why not.

Heh, I don't actually have kids, but I'm using my imagination here and it pretty much stinks.

Yeah, right, then my kid looks over and sees your kid enjoying delicious chicken fingers while he's got "roasted lobster and artichoke soup with black truffle" sitting in front of him. Cue tantrum.

Yeah, I don't think broc + mac and cheese is such an unheard of thing. Pretty sure you can get a couple variates frozen even. Broc + cauliflower + mac and cheese is awesome. And I eat a pretty scant amount of veggies. Peas I'm not sure on, but I can see a kid liking it.

Chuck Jones? You getting your Chucks mixed up, Chuck?

He's practically the new Ayn Rand.

That totally seems plausible.

I'm not even watching and I was indeed baited into clicking. And the reference felt shoehorned enough that I was asking myself "Could there be a character named Bukowski on there?".

Oh, glad I'm not the only who thought that, then. As to Ignacio being a common name, I think I've heard of one in Shakespeare, but that's about it! I live a wildly sheltered life, though, so I will definitely defer to you on that. As far as speculation about things that haven't happened or been made explicitly clear,…

Oh man, I must be doing a terrible job explaining myself. Nacho wasn't on Breaking Bad. Watching this show, I kind of remembered him being on BB. Even though he wasn't. I'm attributing that to him being so well-cast, and also well written and a great actor that he seamlessly meshes with the Salamanca crew we know from…

You know what? I'm not one of those people who's bothered by a story not having that kind of closure. In fact, I think it can be very powerful under the right circumstances. But I really don't feel like this season was strong enough to sustain that kind of thing. A lot of the season I was disappointed by in comparison…

Yeah, DahliaW is correct. To have someone involuntarily committed you have to prove they're a danger to themselves and/or others. When my folks did it to (eh, "for") me, I'm pretty sure they had to go before a judge and everything. And, yeah, Jimmy's certainly not above lying to do that, but they'd pretty much have to…

Well, hopefully there is a trolling element, rather than someone just being themselves. You just never know.

That's hilarious. I don't think it's awful, though. You can have all the activities in the world and I think you're still going to be disproportionately focused on social stuff, because your family, lifetime friends, etc, aren't going to be there.

Three of this guy's five comments here, all in different places (and one mentioning the "multi-orgasmic LOUD sex" Kim must have) have been about how she would never be with a loser like Jimmy.

I hope it's not ageist, but I thought it was totally believable. I think it might have a lot to do with being in a closed social environment like a retirement home, where those kinds of things can get amplified. Ever seen Survivor or Big Brother!?

I may check out The Purple Rose of Cairo. For some reason I get that mixed up with Dead Men Don't Wear Plaid.