It looks like every Nissan sedan. That’s not a compliment. 

That doesn’t look horrible. It’s a Nissan, so it is horrible, but it doesn’t look horrible.

Enough about the BMW X7, can we get back to the tractor now?

It would make paying $20k for a 10 year old Tacoma with 150k miles 0n it a lot more palatable, for one.

5 years later

“Why offer cheaper cars when we can just offer longer loans for more expensive cars?”

US consumers: haven’t had a meaningful raise in decades.

By ‘97 they had airbags on both sides and ABS brakes. So it’s not like you are driving a 1971 VW Bus.

ok boomer

I think you significantly underestimate how much used Siennas go for. Anything with a 2 at the beginning of the model year is either going to cost a lot more than this, or be a LOT rougher.

THIS IS A TERRIBLE MISTAKE.

It just takes one image, and the knowledge that it starts at under $60k to answer this question:

I clicked.  Please remember me when you buy your vacation home.

Name it this picture

Mustang III.

GM does not underrate hp numbers.

The glowing nostrils are the dumbest aftermarket mod to put on these things. My god that thing looks ugly with them. 

The weird triangular lights are unfortunate. Looks like a pig.

First, the hinting of a lifted Veloster. Now a drifting van.

I think I’m becoming a Hyundai fan boy. Sorry Mazda. Start having more fun and maybe we’ll talk again — perhaps a 4WD MPV, like the good ol’ days?

Alpine A110?