In other news, water is wet, the sky is blue, and the sun came up this morning.

Glad I could help! Get that thing safe it’s too pretty.

You mean “grammatical” errors, right?

Scrolling this article is the car equivalent of this -

You were obviously a privileged child. I’m now angry at my parents for failing to buy me this thing that I didn’t even know existed.

Yeah, this is literally the 2000 Ferrari Rossa concept with a new nose.

Just a warmed-over rehash. Okuyama did this one sixteen years ago.

Okay, this will be easy then.

Jalopnik needs 100% more this and 100% fewer shitty jokes from...literally all of their writers.

Subaru makes the only engine I’ve been able to rebuild without a cherry picker. Granted it was an 80s model, but I pulled the heads with the block in the car, then pulled the block by hand. I rebuilt it and then slapped it back into the car the same way. Sure was heavy, but I’ll take a Subaru flat-four over any…

I put a 24mm sway bar on the back of my WRX, and it made it very easy to rotate even on asphalt.

David,

“Man, we are really flying”.

Looks about right.

Finally coming back to my town after 18 years (2.0 tour). Tickets bought.

Lots of similarities! Both use super fun V-twins that are geared well for public street. They use a ton of the same tech. The hyper is just a little higher and sits a little more upright, which I like. Plus i think it looks way cooler. Both are great though, I just lean towards this.

How would you compare this to the Monster R?

And this is exactly why articles like this are ridiculous. Opinion pieces are fine, but lengthy rants that make out your preferences to be completely infallible are garbage.

It’s the hot take of automotive journalism. Thrown out there to get a response knowing full well that it has no reason to be written in the first…

This kind of thing is why Jalopnik and its sub-blogs are so damn good :’)