Because it does. Why not pick something so obviously flammable?
Because it does. Why not pick something so obviously flammable?
The SJWs won’t get this. This could call it something non-flammable, but they’ll defend it in spite of the fact it contributes to the likelihood of cancellation.
The same for “The Shadow”, and “Batman”, and a myriad of other stories using the “mysteries of the orient”.
The life support system for a pair of tits can talk? Or was that the boobs themselves talking?
I think it can be. I also don’t think this is a case of it. You obviously see it everywhere you look.
That is true, but it also involved more than a comic book character, but also Norse mythology.
Of course it is equivalent. You’re changing the race of a comic book character. BFD.
It is the same thing. And Bond is not a comic book magician.
What’s even better is: the next movie will BE ABOUT HIM!
I don’t believe you think at all, now.
And you are wrong. This is a comic book written by whites for a white audience using a stereotype that has never existed. And about magicians, who also never existed.
Everyone gets to play, including Evangelical Christians now!
This was not cultural appropriation. It is a comic book character, and you’d be just fine if a white comic book character got played by a different race.
This was NOT an example of cultural appropriation.
You mean publicly blasting it out?
She also played Gabriel, sexually ambiguous, in Constantine.
I don’t care.
You are simply confused. Cho makes herself the face of this.
None of you ever talk about the street hoods in Nepal being white-washed. Why is that (as if I couldn’t guess.)
Tissue, sweetie?