oatmealjam
Oatmeal
oatmealjam

What I’m saying is that I don’t want the new version at all. 

And I think that's the other thing...honestly he didn't seem "angry" as you put it. But that's just my view. Impassioned? Yes. Snarky? Yes. Angry...nah not quite. Rush Limbaugh is angry. Bill O'Reilly is typically seething. This seemed more tongue in cheek than angry, especially given the laughter throughout from

I'm not blaming the rape victim, I just think she could've dressed less provocatively!

I'm not "putting aside" my agreement, I totally agree with most everything he said, he does have a right to be angry, and I also think he could have said it better, the two aren't mutually exclusive. I don't think that saying he could have delivered his message better makes me a "tone troll" but if that's how you

I don't think it's helpful to the situation to distract from his message by pointing out what you perceive to be flaws in his delivery. This happens every. single. time. someone who has every reason to be angry expresses that anger. Someone who ultimately agrees with them puts aside that agreement to scold them for

Wear these after eating all those made from ice cream cakes and sweet breads in an earlier post.