Ha. “Reichs Farmer Führer” is of course the Minister of Agriculture. It’s late, my brain is tired in both languages.

This a gay porn parody. It’s got something for everybody. Bears, twinks, skinheads, hipsters and... uh... “milk.”

I can’t decide if the Barf Bag is my new favorite part of the day, or new least favorite part, but please keep them up. It’s nice to have a handy summary of all this fuckery in one place at the end of the day.

There are two very important reasons why 3,000 nukes is better than 15,000 nukes.

I’m 47, and I did the same thing. The people criticizing you for your statement don’t understand what it was like and don’t understand the value to START--it’s not just the reduction in nukes that makes it a good thing.

Did you read the article? Did you read the post? The article was clear that a limited nuclear conflict on the other side of the globe would be disastrous to the whole world. His post was clear in that he didn’t even criticize the U.S., just that he was afraid. Which, given Trump’s historic levels of ignorance,…

He’s not the left. He is a person that lives on this planet worried about two countries he has no control over ending his life.

A few points in response:

The Persian Gulf crisis was the blockade of the Gulf in 1985 (I was 15). We had the US and the USSR essentially staring down gun barrels at each other as the Russians were quietly backing Iran.

I’m 60. Here’s what we used to sing when I was a kid:

Sorry. Old fears wrought new. I’ll assume you’re young enough to have never lived with the fear of a nuclear exchange. The last 20 years have been the safest since WW2, largely because of START.

I’m not worried about the number of nukes (100 can kill us all off). START was predicated on the understanding that sane, sensible people will equally reduce their arsenals, and that sane, sensible people would safeguard them. START was important, not because of the reduction, but because of the intent behind it. It…

I am a 46 year old Canadian. I have a wife and two kids. I was 13 when 99 Luftballons was a hit. When I was 15, I was terrified that the Persian Gulf Crisis would spill over and create a nuclear conflict. My parents talk about the Cuban Missile Crisis and have more than once, said that they seriously debated bringing…

She just ran in a grueling and ultimate devastating Presidential campaign. I’m willing to cut her some slack. Also people would definitely be playing the poor loser card and how dare she question the integrity of the election if she spoke out too much. She has to walk a very fine line.

Totally. I probably wouldn’t date someone for more than a few weeks without a test drive, never mind marrying them. It is just good sense!

you have to try it, before you buy it

eerily perfect synergy between user name and image posted

This comment was doing okay until it got to the bullshit “Going by popular vote wouldn’t be faaaaaiiiir....” bullshit. Going by popular vote, a California citizen’s vote would have the exact same weight as a North Dakota citizen’s vote...one citizen, one vote. As it is now in a presidential election, a North Dakota…

Please explain how a single voter in N Dakota would gain greater representation by casting his vote on the coast in a popular vote system. It would be, by definition, the adding of all votes into a single bloc regardless of where they are cast.