“Hillary Clinton isn’t eating this cake because people will mock her, a woman, for eating. She will be teased for taking one bite of the most delicious cheesecake in New York City. We watched Ted Cruz eat his own snot, and he’s still a viable political candidate.”

Why does anybody believe her?

You are unhinged.

Wow. You’re literally living for a communist who makes more than your wildest dreams to ruin baseball for you.

That’s a brilliant ad for Twitter and the attention deficient people that regularly tweet. I like how this article both elevates Twitter as a higher institution while simultaneously implying that there are ‘good’ campaign ads. I think liberals are just addicted to negativity at this point.

Why do liberals never give proper context to their stories? The edited telephone clip was clearly speaking about some specific instance in which people are paying $1.50 for tickets worth several hundred dollars while others are paying full price.

Why do people believe her?

What a weird article. Is this an ad disguised as opinion?

She qualified what she meant in text body. ‘Traditional media’ represents honest ethical media. Honest ethical media is being pressured by the new real-time deadlines and the rapidity with which ‘bloggers’ or whomever can break the story. If its the traditional media’s job to be the vanguard through proper ethical…

Dear jeebus, so many things can go wrong while sit wiping! Are you people animals? Do you know to wipe from front to back at least?

But his problem was literally that he was NOT good at relieving.

Its terrifying to see how ignorant the vocal liberal minority is. Its as if you’ve begun to admire those whose perspectives are negative and destructive. Its a full on psychological depression amongst the people of the USA (and world) that call themselves liberal. There’s always been that question regarding sanity,…

Why does the liberal media take such a strong ‘pro’ stand on vaccination? They act as if they are doctors who know better than other doctors.

They are playing real people on the show (themselves) but they are exaggerated caricatures. They also would eliminate parts of their real personas (such as Jers never mentioning his affinity for birdwatching) for the show. And Clarkson knows well enough that a hammer is not a necessary tool for engine repair, yet he…

I think you’re reading more into his comment than was there. He was not saying that he isn’t responsible for his actions, just that you shouldn’t base your impression of him personally solely on his on-air personality.

You couldn’t be more wrong. In fact it was probably the only honest answer in the interview. The three of them, Clarkson, May, and Hammond are all products of each other, writing, rehearsing, and exaggerating for the purpose of entertainment. The trio are literally caricatures, thus they are all wearing metaphorical…

Good riddance to a vile product. Though I’ll probably eventually miss rubbernecking at this car accident of a website. It was kind of like a liberal zoo where you could watch the animals masturbate in their own vomit and filth.

What did the UFC ‘bend’ to please C.M? Sounds like its the other way around entirely. Instead of Dana having to forfeit a Main Card fight and PPV earnings, McGreggor steps up a couple weight classes as ‘the show must go on’. That’s a team player and a surefire professional. Its also how you garner fans. As for the…

Connor McGreggor lost because he was the smaller of two brawlers. That’s how it works; 90% of the time, the bigger fighter wins. And clearly Connor wasn’t prepared for the extra drain of added mass in the fighting equation - pehaps he would be better served to train at altitude in future weight class jumping attempts.

Nice plane. Seems to make a lot of whining liberals transparently envious. Not that a liberal needs an excuse to espouse vitriol and negativity, they need only a target.