Thank you for that. Being disrespectful or rude with no justification doesn’t get anyone anywhere. One reason I even bother talking about this on Jezebel is to see if someone can say something that actually convinces me of her honesty. I just can’t fathom it at this point.

In order to “victim blame” I’d first have to accept that the person in question was a victim of a crime. I obviously do not.

I understand that there are many things that stop women (and men for that matter) from coming forward or even leaving the relationship and that it effects every demographic. Amber DID leave and she DID come forward with the accusations and I initially believed her. This is a woman who gathered evidence against him for…

To fight for money. Not abuse.

Only things I’ve bothered watching on this list was Arrival and Stranger Things. Enjoyed both. Had Pokemon Go for about a day or so. Clueless on everything else mentioned other than “Becky with the good hair”.

I gave a few relatively short responses to a few other posts on an article concerning their divorce. I got a few replies then responded to some of those as well. It’s called a discussion. How is that “super fucking strange”?

I don’t even know the timeline of this case because I didn’t specify when she first made the abuse claim. Obviously her initial claim of DV was made in court (or, technically, the letter her lawyer sent to his the day after filing for divorce).Even in my post right above yours I said she filed for a TRO. She…

Lol, she discredits herself, dude. And I know what site I’m on. I don’t expect to have the popular opinion on this specific issue here. Sorry I don’t think every person who claims abuse was actually abused.

Right, she can’t go to court unless the public believes you but the public is skeptical of you because you didn’t go to court. I’m not saying that it’s a guarantee the courts would have sided with her but for me personally it would have given her more credibility than what she has done.

Cry me a river.

It wasn’t her asking for money within itself that was of concern. The list of demands in exchange for her own silence 3 days prior to filing for TRO is one thing. It’s her insistence on living off of Johnny’s dime when she’s arguably in a much better position to escape her abuser than most other people. Before the…

A bit hyperbolic but I stand by the sentiment along with many others who’ve been abused and/or worked with abuse survivors. Staying in a home your unstable and perpetually intoxicated abuser has access to after he just had the biggest emotional upheaval of his life (death of his mother) while having the means to go…

Personal experience, friends, and counselors. Many of which have expressed their own outrage about Heard’s behavior. Keep pretending that you’re “calling me out” on something all you want. Heard’s behavior, inconsistent evidence, and stories are strange. She’d be dead if she was truly abused. She’s an anomaly.

The topic of this article is a settlement agreement that contains an NDA. So I shockingly talk about that topic. I said,”In the context of an NDA, Amber talking about DV first person POV then, yes, it’s a “bad thing”. How on Earth you take that as me saying “violence = good. breaking contract = bad” is ridiculous.

It was a stab in the dark for the reasoning behind that figure. Wasser’s fees are high. And, yes, in Wasser’s filings she does mention Amber breaking the NDA. Jezebel didn’t publish a fraction of what was actually filed.

“Victim blamey”? If she signed an NDA that states what she can/cannot say in regard to Depp/their relationship/DV accusations then continually talks about Depp/their relationship/DV accusations then yes she is. If she is breaking that part of their agreement then Depp reserves the right to not uphold his own side of…

Your assumption I think a potential contract breach outweighs violence is troubling as well.

No, her personality or likability doesn’t mean she can’t be abused nor does her own past DV arrest and charge mean that. Whether she was abused or not her behavior has caused many to question her sincerity. It’s not just me thinking I “know” how survivors should or should not act. Behavioral patterns for survivors and…

I don’t know what that “something” I said may or may not be. It could be just to deny or cut the settlement down. As far as what’s publicly known, they’ve let her alleged breaches of the NDA go unchecked until now. So who knows. There’s a hearing next month. Maybe we’ll find out then.

Fair point. I just wouldn’t be surprised if she had. But we’ll see when the hearing happens next month.