Apart from everything else that can be said about both the Warrens and the Enfield case: according to Enfield investigator Playfair the (uninvited by no one) Warrens barely dropped by long enough to say “Totes demons!”

Being a bit too sensitive about this, I think. Naturally. You have an autistic son.

Id throw my money at Count of the Jurassic Island.

And the one about Atheists never being able to resist telling everyone what they don't believe in...

Yeah, but it's not nearly as good. It's a shame because I'm a huge Road Trippers fan. Their website has been so helpful in planning trips!

I just took road-trip from Chicago to Terlingua Texas. I downloaded this app beforehand and it was super helpful on my trip. It was really great for finding food and hotels in random areas I stopped in. The local attractions feature is wonderful and unique, it encompasses off the beaten road attractions, as well…

Bears? I'm pretty sure that's a squatch, dude.

No it's absolutely not. At least in the context you are using. We don't convict on probability and we shouldn't in the public view either.

starting a conversation about it is the last thing that needs to happen. She accused him of raping her, he tried to contact her and ask her what's up, and she went radio silent. Maybe that is because she is going to let lawyers do her talking, maybe that is because she feels like she got called out on a distortion…

What does it matter what the percentages are? We know that false rape claims are made. We also as a society believe in the concept of presumption of innocence. Why should those accused of rape not get the same treatment (especially when no charges have ever been filed and no evidence ever presented)?

damned if he does damned if he doesn't if he denies it and fights it ppl will assume he is lying if he dosen't people assume he did it and feels guilty because in the court of public opinion if you are accused of a sex crime you are guilty. remember that case from the 80's the family that ran a day care that got…

So are you saying, statistically, he's guilty?

Ummm.. what if this turns legal? You don't think maybe the kinds of meandering thoughts and questions you hoped he would pose could potentially hurt his case?

"For us as the public, that's the only useful thing he could have done."

I'm sorry, but I'm completely confused as to why what he said, in his first paragraph, was wrong.

He flat out stated, "We never had sex."

... When did rape get reclassified to making out? Or is this a social redefining of rape that I haven't kept up on, not the actual legal definition?

He wasn't even making this about…

In what world was he REQUIRED to start a larger conversation? It's a personal matter, and he says it is painful to him, so not wanting to open up the floor to a greater debate is pretty understandable.

They fucked and had sex, but after the guy became rich and famous she went to accuse him of rape so he would pay up money.

Because Third Wave Feminism has completely destroyed the definition of rape. Had sex that you regret? Thats Rape. Had sex but afraid someone would judge you for it? Rape. Don't like someone and want to destroy their life? Rape. Look at a woman wrong? Rape. Exist as a male? Rape.

This also makes it a thousand times…

Only partway through, but I don't see how his initial post was bad? I mean, he says he didn't rape her, provides his side of the story, and that's that.