npowers83
npowers83
npowers83

Does her hair look similar to this? That might explain it.

Yeah. So let that be a lesson to everyone everywhere. Any time a new tech site opens that requires registration with a unique identifier, let's flood it and make sure that we all register our ideal handle!

Studos to you, sir. Talk about good fortune!

Why is it that Mail and Calendar are always some of the last apps to be baked into a mobile OS? They're some of the most essential! First QNX, now Win8. What gives?

Dunno why, but the "2go" in the title of the article is super-harsh on the eyes, from a reading perspective. Must be the font. Anyone else have issues with that?

Huh. I guess this explains a lot.

"Crushing the far-fetched dream of wearing 2015 technology on your feet though, the shoes won't be power lacing. That's okay!"

Wow. I guess sometimes I forget that sarcasm doesn't always translate well in plain-text. Yes. A missing tag is in order.

Seriously! Shoddy reporting here, I say. Either that, or someone missed attending Physics 1. You must ALWAYS quote time when referring to a rate.

You know, we didn't really land on the moon, either. Oh, wait...

"Mexico City napped the #1 worst spot,"

All comments should be closed after the Jack Bauer photo. That's about all that needs to be said about this article.

Everyone should do this. Particularly with their Blue Rhino tanks. Build an entire Lego head army running around Wal-Marts, grocery stores, and the like. Could you imagine it? It'd be fantastic!

It's a reverse Backdraft! Awesome.

Typically, yeah. Under the "Support" section. And if your computer is so old that it's not listed on there anymore, well, upgrading the RAM won't help.

Seriously? Did you forget the tag at the end there?

So would the hillbilly present continuous form of "murk" be " murkin' "?

No assumptions made. Simply that someone that's 52 is likely not wearing underwear that look like that. Most likely something closer to Spanx.

Nice turnabout there. Kudos.

Wrong photo. Panties should be AT LEAST 2x that size, per the article. Chick was 52!