Asking the important questions. We see the entire hissy fit, but not a single replay?

I’m curious to see who this miserable asshole is that wrote that message. If this sets him/her off, then I’d hate to see their reaction to the average “weather girl” on most channels these days.

It may or may not be attorney work product, but either way, the press is not going to get trouble for publishing it. If they had obtained the information by unlawful means, it would be another story.

She said the loans weren’t enough for her to live on, so it’s possible her law school doesn’t approve students for enough to pay tuition and cost of living. The schools choose how much to approve per semester.

No question that he can dunk. He’s a 6'1" super-athlete known for having great hops.

I’m sure that Rick Scott would agree Islamic Extremism has never killed anyone. After all, an ideology is an intangible thing. It can’t strap on a bomb and blow itself up in a group of civilians.

Why would it be a card? A bicycle kick is a legal kick. He had no reason to think he was about to kick someone in the head.

If you give them the choice, they will always play. There’s always pressure to do so. They’re expected to be tough manly men. Perhaps we should leave the decision up to actual doctors.

So Bubba the Love Sponge, the guy who recorded and sold the video, claims Hogan knew he was being recorded? Hmm that sounds pretty reliable. Hogan knew he was being recorded and referred to black people using the N word and talked about his marital problems?

The guy on tape mentions that him and his wife are going to make money off of it...not Hulk. Hulk did not know he was being recorded. Are you intentionally lying, or do you just not know what you’re talking about? As far as I’m aware, nobody other than you has even claimed that Hulk knew he was being recorded.

You’re just going to assert that Hulk Hogan (who was married at the time) knew he was being recorded and that the tape would be sold for distribution, without any evidence or reason to believe that? Do you work for Gawker, or what’s the deal?

Why is he sleazy for doing this? It’s a legitimate lawsuit against Gawker, after Gawker acted like sleazebags.

“Even more frivolous...”

Gawker is trying so hard to turn people against Peter Thiel, when most everyone sees Gawker as the villain in this situation.

The title of this article is a joke. It’s obviously not a major fabrication, which Trump already has plenty of.

I agree that, at this point, he should drop the speech transcripts issue. I haven’t heard him bring it up in the last few weeks anyway, though I might have missed something. It was a very legitimate issue to bring up, but since the primary race is over now, there’s no point in Democrats hammering her on it.

Are you really suggesting that Bernie hasn’t been running an issues-oriented campaign and that he’s been resorting to personal attacks? If so, you’re in for quite a shock in the general election.

“I’m fine with Bernie staying in the race to accumulate votes and show Democrats that there is broad, national support for a progressive agenda. I am not alright with him staying in the race in a desperate bid to win.”

It’s interesting that Hillary supporters are trying to so hard to label Sanders supporters as “druggies, hippies,” and sexists. That’ll really help convince Sanders supporters to vote for Hillary in November.

How is Bernie’s refusal to drop out yet hurting Hillary in the general? She stayed in the 2008 primary all the way until June 7, three days after Obama secured the number of delegates to clinch the nomination. It didn’t seem to effect Obama in the general. If she can’t beat Donald fucking Trump in the general, that’s…