nowdaydrinking
Not Enough Day Drinking
nowdaydrinking

ALL THOSE CONDITIONS ARE SUBJECTIVE.

which was even an article on here when an owner tracked down the kid of a customer that stole tips

So if you look at someone and think sexy thoughts, it’s a crime.

Who said anything about jacking off? The law says ‘observing’ is the crime. As in just looking. Not recording. Not jacking off. Not harassing. Just seeing.

This is an imagined problem. Taking other people’s tips in the restaurant business just doesn’t happen. Not only would you get fired on the spot, but you’d probably get a whooping in the parking lot for good measure.

I hear guns are a big problem. What if we diverted money from the military appropriations budget towards setting up national registry of firearms? 30,000+ shot dead a year is a real emergency as opposed to an invented one.

Obviously the teacher was a 1st order creep. I just don’t like the fact that this decision seems to have been made because he was a creep and deserved to be punished. Like i said originally, bad cases make bad laws.

News of all this star power is what’s led some to think that Apple’s Hollywood ambitions could turn the company into a formidable Netflix competitor

Canadians must trust their law enforcement a lot more than I do, because here in the US subjective laws like this typically only get apply to people of color and other ‘undesirables.’ And determining intent is usually the most problematic part of criminal trials.

Yeah, they’re trying to do the same thing with the cadbury eggs. I hate it. Every day cadbury eggs would suck and no one would buy them because they’d always be the old powdery chocolate. Once a year cadbury eggs are great.

I would put them up there because they’re basically the only Valentine’s day candy. I don’t consider chocolate a Valentine’s day candy because you can get the same chocolate on Halloween, or Easter, or Feb 29th or any other day of the year. You’re not fooling me by putting the same chocolate in a heart shaped box and

Parts a) and b) seem pretty straightforward, but how does part c even get applied?

So what’s the standard then? There’s a saying ‘bad cases make bad laws,’ and obviously a teacher filming his students is creepy and a bad case, but who makes the subjective determination of what’s legal to film public and what isn’t? Are you going to arrest everyone who films people in public and let a jury decide

British Prime Ministers - They’re nothing like us!

Only applies to white cops. When a black cop shoots a white woman they catch a murder charge.

Before you go on a racist rant, just remember we have body cams...

It seems as though you’re suggesting that one should consider every possible reason the accuser may be lying. How about considering every possible reason the accuser would not be lying?

Some debts can be transferred over between semesters (like outstanding parking tickets), and some can be accrued during the final semester, but most universities will place a hold on awarding degrees until all outstanding balances are paid.

I wondered the same thing, because Howard’s avg student graduation debt is relatively low (~$28,000), but nowhere near that low. Turns out what was actually paid off was outstanding balances. From the WAPO article:

Only moreso if they had been shot by other cops who ‘feared for their lives’