Because as far as I know there’s no organization known as the LGBTQ. You are LGBTQ, you aren’t in the LGBTQ.

Because they at least have to show where the votes they ended up with came from. The machines may not maintain a record of every individual vote, but the totals are there. The total vote is the sum total returned from every individual machine’s total. 

They’re not inauditable, the state is just refusing to allow anyone to do the audit because ‘reasons.’

“If you have ask...*I’m not going to tell you*” is seriously one of the most annoying, passive aggressive phrases in the English language.

Not AA, but what is there to discuss really?

I think you’d agree though, that if machine rigging via voting machine code was intentional, then displaying it on the screen would not be. It would have to be through incompetence (which the GOP doesn’t lack), but it’s still moot if no one is given access to the machines to check.

The code to switch the votes has to be in the machines either way. So if the machine is audited and the code is checked, it will be found whether you update the display or not. In fact, it’s probably shorter to write the code that doesn’t change the display.

I knew the South was backwards, but damn this was 1992

“Oh sure, Michael Harriot wears blackface in several of his yearbook pictures and no one cares, but I do it one time and suddenly I’m the bad guy?”

So in your opinion, these 2 educated women, at least one of whom is quite well respected, black, and democrat (I don’t know enough about the other), for no fucking reason at all just up and decided to accuse the same man of rape?

kinja

The right time? Dr. Tyson went to the Washington Post with her story LAST YEAR.

The GOP’s foolproof strategy is get to democrats to vote for rapists?

He said - she said: ‘it’s not good, but let’s see’

You want to do a good thing? Vote. Educate. Volunteer.

I always say my personal hell would be full of self-righteous, right wing, religious zealots, so you better pray for me, or I’m taking a bunch of you with me. 

Counter Point:  Prove it

So what you’re saying is that ‘faith’ has no bearing on whether a person does right or wrong?