Bernie should sit his ass down somewhere too. But of course Hillary got more votes than Bernie. The DNC literally worked for Hillary Clinton (signed contract and everything) and actively tried to push Sanders out.

Changing the rules after the election happened? Well at least you can’t fault them for creativity. You had how how many years as a majority to change this beforehand and yet you’re doing it now because?

Look, I’m going to have a hard time getting upset about this while “almond milk” still exists

No...it is the same argument.

Trump’s not middle age though. He’s well into his senior citizen age.

Why are you still talking? You said and I quote:

“gammon,” “to describe a large, self-satisfied, middle aged man who professes an extreme patriotism in large part to disguise his essential selfishness and corruption

This is my thread...any argument here is brought by you. 

I’m arguing that they were within their legal rights to be there.  You apparently disagreed. 

Obviously the footage was edited. Here’s the original.

There is a legal standard for a criminal threat. It doesn’t matter what you think. This threat was not unambiguous and so it is not a criminal threat.

Are you not reading the question? It no longer asks you to list your race. It asks you to list your family origins.

They can just say they were threatening more protests. They did not say they would harm him or his family. As the ‘threat’ was sufficiently ‘ambiguous’ there is no legal basis for a criminal case.

I don’t know why but I get the strong urge to throw something at anyone who says “postmodern” in a sentence.

And no cracking jokes about your mother-in-law’s gravy causing explosive diarrhea while standing in line please.

The point is there is no longer going to be a just ‘white’ checkbox. Are your ancestors from Germany? No? Are they from Spain? Yes? Then you’re Hispanic.

It’s a statement of fact (not a threat) if they’re already at his house...

Huh, that future census question is really interesting.

What would you consider a strategy? You can’t fix hatred, it’s not a rational thing you argue people out of, so making people not racist is pretty much out. Just about every method of getting more people to vote has been tried to not much effect. They try new voter suppression tactics faster than you can undo the…

The free exercise of speech is a constitutional right. So what if it’s in front of his house? As long as they’re in a public street and not on his property and they aren’t committing violence or threatening it they have every right to protest.