And how would you know that until you tried it?

Right. And do you think the % of people described exceeds 1.32 million? I don’t. So please tell me what is factually inaccurate about what I said?

Which actually doesn’t make sense at all. You want your best staff on the floor at the your busiest times. That’s actually one problem tipping does solve.

0% is still millions of people. 1% is 33 million...

“Orangy slices, green limes, rasberry red clusters, lemony curls and grapety bunches”

Pumpkin Smashes Self Under its own Enormous Girth

The link isn’t broken, I just clicked it and it worked. But here are others

“But those who cannot read cannot be expected to know about the negative effects of the resolution.”

But not to be a Supreme Court Justice. 

You realize of course that for many people, a cell phone is their internet connectivity right? So no, talk/text is not good enough. It’s actually far cheaper to just get a smartphone than it is to get a flip phone, a computer, and monthly internet access.

Jeff Fischer thinks he should’ve punted.

Racial minorities make up 82 percent

That kind of makes a huge difference. People who get phones every year are paying up front and out of pocket. People who renew their contracts every 2 years typically get new phones at greatly reduced prices.

I think most people consider a phone to be a basic need in the modern day (tough to get a job if you can’t leave a callback number). But the idea that a large group of people who can’t meet their basic needs is out there waiting in line for the iphone XIIVxz is ludicrous.

I think very few people do this. In fact, only 2% of the US population gets a new phone every year (regardless of income). So the percentage of those living in poverty who get a new phone every year probably rounds to 0%.

Oh, I see. You’re ‘data’ is ‘you know a guy’...figured. 

Source for your claim? Or did you just make it up because you think it’s true?

A little of the ole reverse psychology.

In her Notice of Claim, Cummings says she is owed $120 million in damages

I’m assuming because the intrusion was based on the use of a feature that not all users used.